- Home
- Submit News
- Bands
- Streams
- Best New Music
- Interviews
- Tours
- Reviews
- New Releases
- Contact Us
- Login
Laymen TermsLaymen Terms: 3 Weeks In3 Weeks In (2004)Suburban Home Records Reviewer Rating: 2.5 Contributed by: JesseJesse (others by this writer | submit your own) I just can't figure out this band. The first track "3 Weeks In" is a slower, more experimental rocker reminiscent at times of The Mars Volta type breakdowns with dissonant guitar work. The chorus sounds Incubus-ish. The vocals are unique and pleasing after you get used to them. Overall, not a ba.
I just can't figure out this band. The first track "3 Weeks In" is a slower, more experimental rocker reminiscent at times of The Mars Volta type breakdowns with dissonant guitar work. The chorus sounds Incubus-ish. The vocals are unique and pleasing after you get used to them. Overall, not a bad track, but nothing that really grabs me. Please login or register to post comments.What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
Beatles, bleh, bleh, why did the 'first' big rock group have to sing about yellow submarines. I cannot wait to hear the full album. Beatles covers are hard to do, and this cover is done well. Saw these guys live and they are great. I like the acoustic song, the guitar work is amazing, and I am not a fan of the last song. I agree also that this album is a promotional tool, and it works for me. I will be at the store to buy the new LT album when it is released. Also, I am very luke warm on Suburban Home records' roster, but this is a new kind of band for them, and I like that they are opening it up as a label a little. I expect big things from this band. 1) The Beatles are one of the most overrated bands of all time. oh, and by the way if you don't know who chris hannah, jord samolesky and todd kowalsky are... actually it's awful, not just bad. if it's clear it's a single, than write that into your review. Since when is tigger a racial slur? And I do admit, this isn't one of my best. dude... fuck you and your racial slurs. chalk up one more shitty review for jesse. I think it's pretty aparent that it's a single when in the liner notes it says "3 Weeks In off of upcoming full length." The fact that the last two tracks are an acoustic and a throw away track doesn't mean they suck any less. A bad song is a bad song, no matter how you look at it. Don't like my review? Write your own! I'm criticizing you because you don't know anything about the band you are reviewing. This album is a single. It was released for the sole purpose of marketing Three Weeks In. The second song is, as you noted, a cover. The third song is an acoustic version of a song on their full length. Since I don't know you, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you forgot to mention that in your review. The fourth song was, as another put it, a "throw away" from their first EP nearly two years ago. The song isn't great, but if I'm paying for the cd, why not put some more music on there? Yet, you criticize me without knowing me either...funny how that works...I agree with Pastepunk, first two songs are pretty good. The reason why I made the statement wasn't to sound pretentious. Believe you me, there are a lot of 15 year old shitheads running around on this site who don't know these things. If you know who Lenon and Harrison are (which I hope to fucking God you do) then no harm done. If you don't, then you need to go learn more about music before stating any opinion. this EP is pretty strong - just ignore the last song, as it was an obvious throwaway. the first two tracks make it well worth the few bucks it's sold at. - Jordan Pastepunk You, friend, are an idiot. You criticize people for not knowing enough "rock and roll history" yet you don't know anything about the band that you are actually reviewing. Pathetic review. Completely pathetic. Sorry for being better than you, sheesh. "(I just prefer Lennon's writing to Harrison's [if you don't know what I'm talking about, you need to buff up on your rock n' roll history])" Make sure you buff up on every aspect of Rock & Roll history otherwise this review is much to sophisticated for you. |
Previous
Exclusive StreamsSponsored EventsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteContributing EditorsBryne Yancey Kira Wisniewski Brittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Armando Olivas John Flynn Chris Moran John GentileCopy EditorAmelia ClinePodcast ProducerNariman ShariatPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2013 Punknews.orgTerms of Use Privacy Policy Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us About Punknews.org Other Places to Go |









Nice forum you got here, I'm here to tell you that the end of the world is near, (or not) http://www.casino-los-angeles.com/doliyoli/casino-directory-2005. html