Punknews.org | Kane Hodder - The Pleasure To Remain So Heartless

Review Navigator

Features

Reviews

Kane Hodder

The Pleasure To Remain So Heartless
2004
Cowboy Versus Sailor

Kane Hodder - The Pleasure To Remain So Heartless (Cover Artwork)

Review by: Brian
See others by this writer

Kane Hodder (link)

Only registered users
can post comments

Published on November 5th 2004

Kane Hodder's debut EP A Frank Exploration Of Voyeurism And Violence, released earlier this year, was an interesting blend of pure indie rock and mosh-free hardcore, but really lacked something, seeming a bit misguided - it wasn't completely directionless, but rather it was another case of a band loaded with potential, just looking for the right niche to settle into.

On The Pleasure To Remain So Heartless, Kane Hodder settle into this niche, then rip its outer core inside-fucking-out.

Pleasure is a definite improvement over A Frank Exploration to say the least, as the band takes the logical extension incorporating a slightly more melodic structure, more comfortably fit hardcore parts and occasional bits of post-hardcore (especially the earlier middle part of the disc). Continuing a total abandonment of traditional chorus-verse standard, Kane Hodder thrive on a lack of structure like vultures prey on a lack of liveliness. The rock is a little more rock and the hardcore is a little more hardcore, as when the latter's transition comes in, it's followed with the appropriately heavy guitars and its ilk - the band will change moods at the drop of a dime and simultaneously manage to smooth things over like standard procedure usually wouldn't allow. Juxtaposing screaming growls against indie rock snarls shouldn't work this well, but it does, because they incorporate influences across the map from At The Drive-In to Dillinger Escape Plan (seriously, listen to the intro of "You Sign Your Crimes With A Silver Bullet"). The vocal range is, like the latter, shockingly good, as they jump everywhere from hardcore-induced growling to clean singing to crooning and sinister prophecies.

Depicting surrender doused in flames on the front cover paves the way for the rest of the disc in terms of lyrical subject matter. The personal identity and relationship topics tackled are disguised by often graphic landscapes and occasional biblical imagery, dwelling on cancerous metaphors and a vague reference to suicide here and there. The adolescent misogyny can get clichéd and bluntly corny a lot of times ("tie your hair back / I wanna kiss you before I kill you"), but for the most part, the band seems to know what they're doing.

Music this experimentive these days is never this pretension-free, but Kane Hodder pulls it off in this sense. Hell, they title the second track "I Think Patrick Swayze Is Sexy," and kick it off with Darkness-like crooning, splashing more high-pitched yelps like this across the rest of the song, and even throw in a clap-led chant-along just over a minute in that I'd imagine would translate so well live. It sums up the album quite nicely, showing how you can avoid most trends, still push boundaries and bypass the usual pitfalls without stumbling over the faultlines of such a challenge.

STREAM THE WHOLE ALBUM

Login to rate this album

People who liked this also liked:

Please login or register to post comments.

What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?

Share your opinion by posting comments on the stories that interest you
Rate music and bands and help shape the weekly top ten
Let Punknews.org use your ratings to help you find bands and albums you might like
Customize features on the site to get the news the way you want.

Posted by etwiels88 on 2005-11-27 16:25:25
My Score:

It took a while to get into this cd, but it's pretty refreshing

Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 30, 2005 at 5:57 AM (EST)
My Score:

You're absolutely right about the clap-led chant translating well live. Andrew is a great vocalist with real range. and he really knows how to get a crowd going live.

This band has a truly unique sound and in my opinion, potential to leave a real mark and influence on future artists.

Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 25, 2005 at 5:12 PM (EST)

I saw them live , they are good . There cd is ok .... um yeah...

Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 3, 2004 at 6:07 PM (EST)
My Score:

This album is awesome, i can't wait to see them live

Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 at 4:52 PM (EST)
My Score:

hey i just reviewed this for my school's radio station. how bout that? not bad, not great. the sticker on this cd says RIYL Bear vs. Shark. HA. this band does not even begin to compare with Bear vs. Shark. note to all: never trust those damn stickers.

Posted by Anonymous on Monday, November 8, 2004 at 12:21 PM (EST)
My Score:

Maybe they should make a quality step up and call the band Michael Meyers....oooohhhh hahaha

Posted by Anonymous on Monday, November 8, 2004 at 8:29 AM (EST)
My Score:

Never actually listened to this band.......but it has to be the lamest band name ever, or one of the lamest. Why name your band after an actor who plays a famous b-movie killer in some of the worst horror films of all time?

Agoor haaak!! Raaaaaaar!!!! Grrrrrrrrrrr!
Raaaaa!

-Jason Vorhees

Posted by Anonymous on Monday, November 8, 2004 at 3:22 AM (EST)
My Score:

Posted by Anonymous on Monday, November 8, 2004 at 12:14 AM (EST)
My Score:

News Flash: There is already a band called Voorhees and they fucking own.

Cut the crybaby Indie shit or get a less-brutal name.

-Ken

Posted by stevejonestherealbones on 2004-11-07 21:27:18
My Score:

this shit is a dime a dozen nowadays.

- jones the bones

Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 6:04 AM (EST)
My Score:

I like the cover art. It tickles my fancy.

Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 6, 2004 at 5:03 PM (EST)
My Score:

i got this cd... just not that good.

Posted by bogey4 on 2004-11-06 16:09:39
My Score:

Has anyone else noticed the shift in reviews where they are having a much greater emphasis on album sequencing? Its nice to see the albums being analyzed on more in-depth level and with the reviewer paying attention to more than just the obvious "first-listen" characteristics. Now if we had some critique on the album art as well, things would *really* be progressive for punknews.

Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 6, 2004 at 3:31 PM (EST)
My Score:

Dude, Scott is still large and in charge.

Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 6, 2004 at 1:12 PM (EST)
My Score:

Awesome Brian, just awesome, i think i've forgotten about Scott by now. I just wish you'd look more like michael moore.

Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 6, 2004 at 5:21 AM (EST)
My Score:

This is the first time a reviewer has understood the (I thought, obvious) connection between my artwork and Hodder's music.
About time!

Great review, well written.

//Drew

Posted by irish_joo on 2004-11-06 00:42:38
My Score:

just buy the colossal record again. Why? because it's that flippin good.

Posted by aubin on 2004-11-05 23:53:32
My Score:

Couldn't have said it better myself, Brian.

It's a good record with both strong songwriting, and an especially talented vocalist.

Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 5, 2004 at 11:43 PM (EST)
My Score:

I need to buy an indie rock album released this year in the vein of Colossal/Jets to Brazil/Mission of Burma. What do I buy?

-bemused

Posted by pastepunk on 2004-11-05 19:58:17
My Score:

Great review Brian - I think we both have a very similar view of the release. The lack of pretension is perhaps the bands best asset while playing a style that's so incredibly hard to pin down.

Posted by crossfiyaaa on 2004-11-05 19:28:14
My Score:

Kane Hodder suck.

Features

Contests

Reviews

Kane Hodder