FeaturesContestsReviews
| Some GirlsThe DNA Will Have Its Say2005 Three One G
Review by: Meg See others by this writer Official Website (link) Only registered users can post comments Published on May 20th 2005
A group comprised out of members from the Locust, Give Up The Ghost, the Plot To Blow Up The Eiffel Tower and Unbroken really can do no wrong. Some Girls' latest release, The DNA Will Have Its Say, only provides more evidence to attest to this. In all of its six-minute glory. Please login or register to post comments. What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
I am cunt for write short reviews To the person below me: Write longer reviews in future you cunt. ""This album is definitely something something to get while the getting’s good before they release their next full-length on Epitaph." "This album is definitely something something to get while the getting’s good before they release their next full-length on Epitaph." Chinatown: My brain tells me that you care a bit too much about the length and/or quality of my reviews. Nobody is forcing you to read them, really. It obviously doesn't take too long to read them so I guess I'm not wasting your time LOL. This band is a disgrace to hardcore. Get them the fuck out. I think there are parasites in my stomach. I feel this burning, ticklish feeling all day. don't blame the reviewer for being shitty, blame the website for worsening itself by posting this crap Wow, Chinatown just reached a new low. Wow. I don't mind short reviews if I get an idea of what the release sounds like, however, after reading this, I have no idea what Some Girls sound like. Hahahaha, Chinatown. You are such a jealous little biotch. Chinatown....fuck off. What do you do for the site outside of be a dick? You are a good village asshole though, ill give you that much. I love this band. Ooooookay, guys, let's all just take a minute and chill before we say something we can't take back. Gee, the whole process took around 5 seconds... i like short reviews. i think they are far superior to long reviews The fact that you went through the trouble of copy/pasting this to word, just to word count it for this one post, says you really need to find something better to do with your life. Sally_Field: My wordcheck tells me that the 3 reviews you copy/pasted add up to a grand total of 794 words. Scott's review of Weezer's Make Believe ran well over a thousand. The average length of a review by old-school staffers runs at around 600-700 words. Enough said. I find their sound to be great. You sound like those old cronies who raged against punk rock in the 70's; "Playing too disjointed! Wow, if music isn't played in a way that's expected and normal, it must all be a fashion show!" The Yeah Yeah Yeahs are awful. If music dosen't sound good, it's not good. "but this is admittedly a bit short (probably could've used a proof read, too). The Yeah Yeah Yeahs are awesome, but usually taken out of context. They aren't supposed to be "garage rock revival"... They're simply a unique band with really interesting guitar work. This album title sounds like an episode of Maury. Fucking blows overrated Bane out of the water... Stop reviewing, please. I'd rather read an EMOHOLOCAUST incoherent rant. All of her (still confused on if you are actually a girl by the way, not that its a big deal, I just dont know whether to call you him or her.) reviews are pretty much a perfect length if you ask me. If I wanted to read a book about the band covered in flowery language and ridiculous hipster metaphors Id go to fuckin pitchfork. See, you fucker? I'm not the only one. Hey, I didn't forget Brian. now i will admit that i do not review too much anymore (a full-time job will do that to you) Did you sleep with Adam, Aubin or Scott (or all 3?) so you could be a staff reviewer?? but this is admittedly a bit short (probably could've used a proof read, too). Julliana Hatfield is in a band called Some Girls. Band name is already taken. I slept with Adam but i'm still not staff. We are getting hitched though. I generally like to read and write shorter reviews, but this is admittedly a bit short (probably could've used a proof read, too). "Did you sleep with Adam, Aubin or Scott (or all 3?) so you could be a staff reviewer?? " Ten dollars says Ken owns an "I was there in '84, where were you?" shirt, is five feet tall, and probably nearly obese. "A group comprised out of members from the Locust, Give Up The Ghost, the Plot To Blow Up The Eiffel Tower and Unbroken really can".......just fuck right off. Did you sleep with Adam, Aubin or Scott (or all 3?) so you could be a staff reviewer?? 31G keeps rejecting my card when I try to order this. I want it but they just won't let me. lol! But the real question is, what's their credibility like? "With most tracks barely longer than a minute long" Ordered this last week, I'm psyched. The EP is less than 7 minutes long. How fucking long to do you want the review to be? I prefer shorter reviews. Its probably due to my ADD though. Hey Chinatown! "chaotic hardcore punk" i hate to nitpick but this review says absolutely nothing about what the band sounds like. i know what they sound like, the first album was amazing, but if i didn't i would still have no clue what they sounded like. just saying... I'm glad to hear this as as good as the Starting Line album. There's two 'somethings' in the last sentence or so. How is she already a staffer? You'd have to combine three of her reviews to form one standard-length review. "They’ve even got bunnies and rainbows in their distinct and unique album art. " I'm glad to hear this as as good as the Starting Line album. i downloaded this off Emusic last week. Pretty fucking cool record, shame its a bit short I'm interested in hearing this, but where the fuck is the Bane review? I totally disagree with everything I've read, its a great album. |