- Home
- Submit News
- Bands
- Streams
- Best New Music
- Interviews
- Tours
- Reviews
- New Releases
- Contact Us
- Login
Snake EyesSnake Eyes: Demo 2005Demo 2005 (2005)1917 Records Reviewer Rating: 4 User Rating: Contributed by: Sally_FieldMeg (others by this writer | submit your own) You know there has to be some gimmick when a hardcore band releases their first demo and within the first week of its availability, over 700 were distributed. Or the fact that the demo actually is of good quality. Snake Eyes' gimmick is pretty cut and dry. The band features ex-members of Terror and .
You know there has to be some gimmick when a hardcore band releases their first demo and within the first week of its availability, over 700 were distributed. Or the fact that the demo actually is of good quality. Snake Eyes' gimmick is pretty cut and dry. The band features ex-members of Terror and Carry On, as well as current members of Internal Affairs.
Please login or register to post comments.What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
He's probably talking about crust or thrash. ken, list some bands from the other hardcore universe. i never liked the throwdown/hatebree/etc crap and i'm interested Please, please don't compare Hatebreed and Champion. I'm not saying that Champion are amazing or anything, but to be compared to Hatebreed is insulting in the highest degree. It simply cracks me up that the average "hardcore" fan will never in their lives actually listen to, let alone see, a real hardcore band. I exist in an alternate universe where hardcore music is intelligent, political and challenges the many sacred cows of modern society. Hillary Duff. She sells more then both of them. I think that says something. Shes one angry bitch. the fact that you want to fight bsd and (probably) like what you think of as hardcore just proves BSD's point. Sure I dont aggree with everything BSD says, but he is entitled to his opinion and says whatever the hell he wants. thats respectable to say the least. the problem with modern hardcore is some of the bands that label themselves as hardcore attitudes are the antithesis of those who pioneered hardcore in the first place. If ian mackaye is, in fact, "the godfather of hardcore" then all these hardcore bands with their crews and shit like that are the opposite. ian, above all, encouraged individuality. the whole tough guy attitude is a complete bastardization of what hardcore was meant to be. so you cannot excuse hardcore as progressing. hardcore today is like MTV and MTV2. MTV started as "24 hours of music" back in the day and thats what it was. but today the music aspect of mtv is now secondary in the form of MTV2. the same with hardcore. what is currently being labeled hardcore is for the most part tough guy "spit my rage in your fucking face" shit, while those who stay true to what hardcore is all about have been pushed to the sidelines. think about it, who sells more records? Terror or champion? You kids need to grow the fuck up (yeah, I'm 18 and YOU should grow up) and open your eyes to a lot of shit. (after school of course) Meet him at the flagpole. i will travel anywhere in the united states to fight bsd. i'm not kidding. give me a time and a place and i will come and i'll fight you. No, I was pointing out how they are not, in fact, "old school" hardcore, as everyone hails them to be. Sure, they're from the late 80's, but they formed after the movement had been around for more or less a decade. "if this isnt real hardcore than either is agnostic front, the cro mags and black flag. because if one had actually listened to this you would see those 3 influences are very apparant in this bands music." You people are ridiculous. Hardcore just like every other genre has progressed. You can't expect every band to sound like Youth of Today or Gorilla Biscuits. Hardcore ended up progressing and being carried on through bands like Terror and Throwdown. I admit these bands are ridiculous with their "crews" and other bullshit, but just because the music's changed you can't go on saying that they're being fake and that there's no sincerity behind the music. I know what I was trying to say at the end of my last post. The question is...do you? "did you even listen to it? the way you talk about this would lead one to believe youre talking about girl jeans and eyeliner wearing metalcore shit, which would lead one to believe you didnt in fact listen to it. "This is not hardcore. This is marching music for the clone army of homoerotic (yet homophobic) schoolboys of the fauxcore scene. All this does is damage the reputation of music that CAN be good." *shit eyes* ???? as soon as i read "ex-members of carry on" i knew i had to check this out. it's alright, definitely nowhere near as strong as carry on, but then again, what is? we need more bands like paint it black and champion representin' "true hardcore," not this jockcore, pseudo-metal shit. "I said snake eyes, yeah. It's a gambling term...or it's an animal term. Alright." "why? dont you like to read?" "These are the vocals Bane should have instead" sally writes the best reviews as far as i'm concerned...i have read a few complaints in the past and whatnot...but i think its about time punknews had a staffer that can write a review in a couple of paragraphs what i heard from these guys was good. 1917 records also has Guns Up!...good stuff. score is for GI Joe, not a snakes actual eyes and not what happens when you roll two ones...score is for gi joe These are the vocals Bane should have instead |
Previous
Exclusive StreamsSponsored EventsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteContributing EditorsBryne Yancey Kira Wisniewski Brittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Armando Olivas John Flynn Chris Moran John GentileCopy EditorAmelia ClinePodcast ProducerNariman ShariatPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2013 Punknews.orgTerms of Use Privacy Policy Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us About Punknews.org Other Places to Go |









intense punk rock....