Red Hot Chili Peppers / Weezerlive in Las Vegas (2005)Warner Music Group Reviewer Rating: Contributed by: SteveJonesTheRealBones (others by this writer | submit your own) Published on July 22nd 2005
# 4.2 Why do you cover Weezer?Okay, now that we have that out of the way, I will continue with the review. On this past July 4th weekend, Las Vegas celebrated their 100th birthday by putting on this free show. All you had to do was be lucky enough to get tickets through Ticketmaster before they were all accounted for. Also, hookers were two-for-one the whole weekend; what a great city. The show was outside on a field with 50,000 people. It was hot, beer was too expensive, and I was very far away from the stage. This was my first time seeing Weezer, and I have generally enjoyed all of their albums (although I only really liked half of Make Believe). So I thought I would enjoy watching them perform their songs live. I was horribly wrong. They played their songs, did not interact with the crowd at all, and walked off the stage. There was no emotion of any kind. The band just went through the motions for about 40 minutes, then set down their instruments and walked off. It also didn’t help that I was about 100 yards from the stage. Weezer's set consisted of a mix of their hits from all the albums except for Pinkerton. If they played anything from Pinkerton, it was within the first couple of songs that I missed. I would have had a better time listening to Weezer in my hotel room with my friends. The Red Hot Chili Peppers came on stage and rocked. I am not too familiar with their songs, so I can't tell you really what kind of set they played, but I recognized many of the songs from the radio, and they played "Can't Stop," which is a favorite of mine. The band was full of energy and the sound was great; girls all around were creaming in their pants over the singer and how “ridiculous” Flea is on bass. I swear the hippie girl standing behind me used the word “ridiculous” whenever the camera focused on his bass; so, about 20 times. They also debuted a couple of songs that basically sounded like average Chili Pepper songs; you know the kind, songs with “ridiculous” bass lines and a sexy singer. My only real complaint is that I basically had to watch this on the jumbo screens, and I wish one of the three at least were reserved for just showing the band. No psychedelic shots, no closeups, no shaky camera angles, no crotch shots...just a plain shot of all the members of the band. I didn’t come to watch an MTV video; I came to see a concert. The night ended with perhaps the best fireworks show I have ever seen. I found out afterwards that the Adolescents opened the show. That means it was a punk show, right? Anyway, if you only get three things from reading this review, take any of these:
Please login or register to post comments. What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
Hey, you suck, weezer rocks live in concert, you just must have caught a bad show... should give 'em another chance this was a free show so it doesnt really apply but I never understood why people go to concerts where they have to watch the band on a screen. I guess some people like being around a dense crowd of assholes just for the company I must say jones, that link to the World Fireworks is boss., Old Friends always end up having Sex Have you heared Weezer's Beverly Hills? Jones the Bones is a fucking faggot but the review actually isn't too bad. Still, he sucks dick. You should write more reviews, Bones. Excellent job; short and sweet, to the point. People need to realize that this isn't Pitchfork. I'm sick to death of long, self-important reviews with unreadably turgid prose and cringe-inducingly misused "big" words. Aubin, I'm looking at you. "If you don't think the Beastie Boys are worth your time then forget about having an opinion, you just voided yours." ""Red Hot Chili Peppers started as a punk band, fuckwad." I believe they are in refrence to the chili peppers pre-enlightened days (just like the beastie boys), when Flea got in some trouble for getting a bit too touchy with a girl on the set of an MTV thing and saying he wanted to put it in her bum. I think she pressed charges. someone want to fully explain the rape comments that have been thrown around a couple times in these comments? You see alot of people hate RHCP due to their history of shady(rape) antics that include weird domonation issues. "Red Hot Chili Peppers started as a punk band, fuckwad." I really don't understand the opposition to the Red Hot Chili Peppers. The way I see it, since 1995 their music has only improved. The same can't be said about weezer... "I was referring to this comment, you testicle inspector: I was referring to this comment, you testicle inspector: That Ted Leo review you did blew this away. I actually didn't know jones could write such a damn good review. props to jones. I don't even like Weezer, but what are they doing playing with the Godfathers of Date Rape Rock, The Red Hot Chili Peppers? I mean Weezer's a little better than that. "Red Hot Chili Peppers started as a punk band, fuckwad." Red Hot Chili Peppers started as a punk band, fuckwad. "But make sure you only review "punk" bands so the narrow minded assholes will have a little less to bitch about." "Are two live Weezer reviews really all that nessisary in one week. One more review of something interesting would have been better. Although it would probably be a review of some shitty hardcore band or mall punk garbage instead of something worth reviewing. The review section of this site is going doooown hiiiiilll." Damn good review Jones. haha. swingline always cracks me up. Are two live Weezer reviews really all that nessisary in one week. One more review of something interesting would have been better. Although it would probably be a review of some shitty hardcore band or mall punk garbage instead of something worth reviewing. The review section of this site is going doooown hiiiiilll. This was a great review. Hit all the highlights. Very well written and zero bullshit. Please write some more reviews. But make sure you only review "punk" bands so the narrow minded assholes will have a little less to bitch about. Old Red Hot Chili Peppers is better than most of the shit that passes as "hip" music these days. 1. Don’t ever go to a show of 50,000 people unless it's free. Yeah, this was a good review from the Bones. awesome review. i am a bones fan. To the guy who said Weezer don't suck in concert: All reviews should be like this. wrong, weezer does not suck in concert. This was just way out of their comfort zone. Big Festivals are rarely good chances to really get a feel for how a band is live. You're better than this Jones. Jones should be staff. This review kicked ass. can't handle it? what are you, some kind of fag? Excellent work Jones. This score is for 2-for-1 hookers. The temperature has gone way up since you left. The high on Tuesday was 117. My fat ass can't take it. because Jones took the time to write it and his review ideology is respectable...Short and sweet. Admit it you read everything he posts. I didn't actually read this review, but I did read the little bullet points at the end. I feel that pretty much sums up the point. It's true, people hate to admitt it, but Weezer are probably the shittiest live act ever. They might as well make a mix CD and put up cardboard cut outs and charge half the price. As for RHCP, they're cool, and Vegas IS hot, | Features
Previous
Exclusive StreamsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteNews EditorsKira WisniewskiBrittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Katy Hardy Matthew Baldwin Armando Olivas John Flynn Video EditorChris MoranSocial Media EditorJustin AugustCopy EditorAmelia ClineReviews EditorJoe PeloneInterviews EditorRichard VerducciPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2012 Punknews.org Other Places to GoPunknews.org Flickr Pool |





