FeaturesContestsReviews
| Make UpAfter Dark1996 Dischord
Review by: GreenVandal See others by this writer Southern Records Profile (link) Only registered users can post comments Published on October 9th 2005
Few bands have ever accomplished the level of confusion that the Nation of Ulysses were able to perpetuate in their four short years of existence. The band's swagger, destructive live shows, and jazz-infused brand of hardcore mixed with their over-the-top political rants and uncompromisingly militant presentation to create a mystique that has nearly become legendary. After the Nation’s implosion, three-fifths of the band teamed up with ex-Frumpies guitarist Michelle Mae to form the Make-Up. Rather than just continue on with the self-created “Ulysses Aesthetic,” the four decided to go in a somewhat different direction. A direction called Gospel Yeh-Yeh.
Please login or register to post comments. What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
great CD. But "In Mass Mind" is way better. Just listen to "Time Machine". this is true, will would have to be at least 40 years old in order to have any real cred. He's just the guy who writes off the "popular" bands and states lesser known bands as amazing in order to seem more "indie". whenever will spouts off shit about how these bands were and percieved and what sort of scene it was, i just cant help but laugh. all this shit was going on before he was born/in diapers and he says stuff like in here and stuff like big black is an image band and minor threat were posers and shit...i cant help but laugh. Eh, the Ian worship is a bit overboard. NoU were great, but nothing that special. They just came along when there was a huge lull in that sort of music... And I guess their attitude was pretty original, but I for one think that the whole "let's make fun of politics" thing did not work for any band after them (except for Born Against, and at least with them, you knew where they were coming from). It makes their beliefs too ambiguous and they just come off as nihilistic losers with nothing to say... Though I'm pretty sure that's not what they really are. Indeed, but MC5 also borrowed elements from blues and gospel traditions. It's not surprising that rock n' roll is still playing music black culture created decades ago. they all just copied the mc5 anyways. Refused were my idols until I found out about NOU and Born Against. (click my profile and read my review of the new noise EP...I pretty much typed that review with my boner) How serious were NOU in the politcal stance? Some of the stuff in "13 Point..." is really dense stuff but I can't see anyone taking it THAT seriously. Also, I was really bummed out when I found out that Refused (which i thought was soooo revolutionary when I was 17) pretty much stole NOU and Born Against's respective schticks. hey, i've always loved refused and t(i)nc. and i wasn't saying that they completely ripped off their music from those bands. but come on, the long "manifestos" and shit? that's total nation of ulysses/make up. "shut up with the "ripping off". your lame. most bands take something from another band, if they mean to or not." shut up with the "ripping off". your lame. most bands take something from another band, if they mean to or not. while t(i)nc does owe a lot to the make up, and refused clearly borrowed NOU's asthetic, their music sounds NOTHING like them. it really annoys me when people (ie the second commentor) claim that refused ripped of NOU. there music bares very little resemblence to each other. I have something else by them. It is a digipack and has blue lettering. It sounds like dance-rock mixed with a bit of Stooges. It's okay, has some good songs and some that aren't that great. anyone ever notice that refused was kinda ripping off nation of ulysses? Hey. I wrote this. I'm a tool. |