Resident Genius / Howard ZinnYou Can't Blow Up a Social Relationship (2005)Thick Records Reviewer Rating: User Rating: Contributed by: Brian (others by this writer | submit your own) Published on October 11th 2005
I stumbled across this blasted compact disc in my car stereo after my son had gone off to one of those damn hippie rallies (he was claiming to visit Father Smith to help arrange the letters on the local church sign to 'SUPPORT OUR TROOPS'). It's apparently called a "split CD," since it features two different artists performing respective works.
Please login or register to post comments. What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
"read voices of a people's history, that's where i'm getting my facts from. estimates were that they were killing people in the millions, just mass genocide. hence the comparison of columbus - the guy who brought the destruction and death to the new world, to hitler, who did it much more deviously, but five centuries later" To the guy two posts down: Does that make Columbus a compassionate conservative? A Short Account of the Destruction of Your Ass-Clown "I'm Super Smart" Blather. You mindless "liberals" can never see the facts objectively. Yes, Columbus was cruel, and he tortured, enslaved, and approved organized violence toward the natives. The violent deaths Columbus was personally responsible for are minute, however, in comparison to any other genocide in history. Even when figuring in violence at the hands of the U.S. later on you're still looking at a body count in the tens of thousands. Horrific, no doubt, but nothing compared to the Holocaust or the war in Indochina. Columbus and the conquistadors were bastards, but the fact that disease was the main culprit is well-documented. To the guy talking out his ass below, disease spread with staggering rapidity through both continents. Smallpox was so virulent that it often moved more quickly than the Europeans themselves; I think Las Casas wrote about villiages that had been completely wiped out long before contact with the west. Smallpox didn't factor in until the 19th century?? By then the vast majority of the native population had died from it. Give me a break. Why don't YOU read a real history book instead of regurgitating hippie bullshit. i'm the guy who first mentioned it and immediately after inagreendase posted what he did, i said "oh, looks like i was wrong, but here's why i had reason to think otherwise..." Early copies don't mean ur right. It's an OFFICIAL release date, check their website if ur not sure. www.g7welcomingcommittee.com No one was trying to blaze you, but the Propagandhi album comes out on the 18th, jeez. Deal with it. Why would this suburban dad come across Howard Zinn while trying to improve his linguistics? Given that the word "genocide" is less than 70 years old and that it has a legal and distinct definition, it's tough to say. Regardless, Columbus = Bad News Bears. A ruthless and brutal guy responsible for countless atrocity. That said, I stand by my assessment that considering the ideologies involved, the politics, technologies, means, etc. the Holocaust was a unique form of mass murder, a bureaucratic campaign within a technocracy. read voices of a people's history, that's where i'm getting my facts from. estimates were that they were killing people in the millions, just mass genocide. hence the comparison of columbus - the guy who brought the destruction and death to the new world, to hitler, who did it much more deviously, but five centuries later. That last line (before the note of course) was brilliant. Good job Brian!! Read the text, my friend. No one actually said that Hitler personally killed anyone. And sure, way to go, you recognize the sociological problem of the banality of evil, That said, Hitler, like Eichmann, was directly involved in the Final Solution (war crimes and genocide). Columbus had people's hands chopped off for not bringing him back enough gold, but I'm sure he wasn't the one witelding the blade. And, of course, it wasn't really "the German people" who were doing the killing, but so it goes. Smallpox didn't really factor into things as catostrophically at the end of the 15th century as it did in the 19th century (ie Lord Jeffrey Amherst, etc). So, forgive me if I find your assertion that everyone "get their facts straight" kind of irritating, self-indulgent, and erroneous. Hitler never killed anyone (except perhaps his neice), the German people did. Columbus was PERHAPS directly involved in the deaths of thousands of people, not millions. Smallpox was the real killer, no matter how intent the Spaniards were in their attempts to wipe out the natives in one way or another. Get your facts straight. i also bought it yesterday (in the Bronx) so i know it's available. i was just pointing out the official release. When you consider the ideologies, technologies, politics, and means involved, it's really rather inappropriate to put Columbus next to Hitler. Let's not get too carried away, though, with our Columbus / Hitler comparisons my only problem with the review was the very last line Hmm. Well, Mr. inagreendase, I guess that's that. It comes out on the 18th. I bought the new Propagandhi at a record store in New York this morning. So... umm.. I don't know what to tell you chump. I went to a public high school and then a private one. Zinn's People's History was taught in the 11th grade US History class at the private school. And the school was a very traditional jacket and tie type place. Regardless, it should be a part of every American high school student's education. nice little review concept. good job Brian. Ah, I get it. Nice. At first I was all "aaahhhhhahaha ripped condom" but now I see the joke. Nice review. zinn is great... fuckin people's history of the united states should be taught in every public school nationwide. fuck this intelligent design bullshit, teach kids that columbus day is named after a guy that killed more people than hitler. "I'm liberal wahhhhhh." No Propagandhi review on the day of it's release? Chomsky's stuff is, I think, very different from Zinn's. Zinn is certainly more personable and accessible. He contributes a genorosity to his wit, humor, and mischief. And he's always pushing forward (though some could say that his work has been a bit of a neutral train these days, but hey, he was born in 1922). yeah. havent written in it in awhile. isnt it linked? Howard Zinn is great, I prefer his stuff Chomsky's, sorry if that's blasphemous, but I've always thought that Howard Zinn backed up his opinions more logically. will, Zinn is a smart guy... Well, I guess that's pretty obvious since he writes books and I write 200-word record reviews... And in my Xanga. | Features
Previous
Exclusive StreamsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteNews EditorsKira WisniewskiBrittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Katy Hardy Matthew Baldwin Armando Olivas John Flynn Video EditorChris MoranSocial Media EditorJustin AugustCopy EditorAmelia ClineReviews EditorJoe PeloneInterviews EditorRichard VerducciPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2012 Punknews.org Other Places to GoPunknews.org Flickr Pool |





