Punknews.orgPunknews.org Logo
Review Navigator

BackForward

Features

 




Reviews

Epitaph Records -- Millencolin

I noticed there was not a single QOTSA review on the site, and for open-minded individuals like us I felt knowledge of this album had to be shared. Sure, I hated this band when Songs for The Deaf was all over the radio and TV, but since then my tastes have matured and blues-influenced rock has become an essential part of my collection. Don't kid yourself though, as this album is anything but that, with styles as varying as the musicians themselves. Spawned from Josh Homme's relatively overlooked yet brilliant work in Desert Sessions, many artists from several backgrounds have come forth to be a part of this project.

For fans of Screaming Trees, Kyuss, Dwarves and good alt-rock, pick this up immediately. It's a tough listen at points, but when this album slowly seeps into your subconcious you'll find yourself singing this shit at work. This record's a trip; I do not recommend using this album while operating heavy machinery.



People who liked this also liked:
Local H - As Good As DeadTV on the Radio - Return to Cookie Mountain [U.S.]The Bronx - The Bronx (2006)Wolf Parade - Apologies to the Queen MaryBeatsteaks - Limbo MessiahT.S.O.L. - TSOL/Weathered StatuesAlkaline Trio - GoddamnitThe Damned - Machine Gun EtiquetteHimsa - Ground Breaking CeremonyThe Hold Steady - Boys and Girls in America



Please login or register to post comments.
What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
  • Share your opinion by posting comments on the stories that interest you
  • Rate music and bands and help shape the weekly top ten
  • Let Punknews.org use your ratings to help you find bands and albums you might like
  • Customize features on the site to get the news the way you want.

    Posted by clamum on 2006-08-22 18:38:04

    Wow. jones the bones you're one stupid piece of shit.

    Posted by Not-To-Regret on 2006-06-30 22:25:45
    My Score:

    If anyone stumbles onto this review, I will admit I did a terrible job, I was stoned at the time, and maybe drunk? I seem to recall more drug references in relation to the "feel good hit of the summer" as a track and an album. This review was severly edited and cut, it was much longer but i'm sure it was still staunched gibberish. Score still stands, just buy the damn record already.

    Posted by pabstboy on 2005-10-22 15:38:45

    QOTSA is a pretty BA band. I don't care for their latest effort though. Bands like Fu Manchu and Nebula are great stoner rock.

    Posted by stevejonestherealbones on 2005-10-21 22:35:42

    not to regret. suicide is not the answer

    castration is. it worked for me!!!1111111111111111!!

    - jones the bones

    - stevejones8770@yahooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 19, 2005 at 2:55 PM (EDT)
    My Score:

    I guess its suicide again for me!

    -Not-To-Regret

    Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 19, 2005 at 1:22 PM (EDT)

    qotsa is a good band with or without nick!

    you guys should review more good stuff like fu manchu and the hellacopters.

    Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 18, 2005 at 1:39 PM (EDT)

    I kind of picture Jerry Only as Carl from Aqua Teen Hunger Force. You know, with the gold chain, sweatpants, flip-flops and the silly car.

    Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 18, 2005 at 2:49 AM (EDT)

    better than the dwarves?
    OK their last 2 albums were shitty but if you say that QOTSA wrote better songs than on the young and good looking & Blood, Guts & Pussy you are a moron

    Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 10:48 PM (EDT)

    superdude posted here....

    Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 10:20 PM (EDT)

    Where the fuck is superdude???

    Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 5:14 PM (EDT)

    But what about Jerry Only? I feel bad that he was eating and counting his money, then interrupted over the Armstrong-Dalle divorce.

    But QOTSA, doesn't have a Scrappy-Doo guest rapper to bog down their songs. But Josh did push Tim into a new direction of suck. So I guess, Josh should atleast say he's sorry. DO IT FOR THE FANS!

    Posted by NoUse4aScnName00 on 2005-10-17 17:06:20

    this is my favorite album to listen to when i'm stoned.......

    Posted by the_other_scott on 2005-10-17 17:03:15

    as far as i know, the "c-c-c-c cocaine" part is sung by rob halford (sp?)

    this album is killer

    these guys are better than the dwarves (who i like)

    and josh homme is a thousand times more talented, and less obnoxious, than tim armstrong

    Posted by SkolarX on 2005-10-17 16:57:59

    never got the appeal of some stoner jacking off a guitar. i saw them open for nin a couple weekends ago, didn't do anything for me and i've seen them a few other times. always seemed pretty boring, though it was kind of cool seeing dave grohl play drums

    Posted by fox82 on 2005-10-17 15:57:27
    My Score:

    Nope, i tried downloading this again and couldn't be fucked. Still shit.

    Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 1:29 PM (EDT)

    Not a fan of this band.

    Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 12:23 PM (EDT)
    My Score:

    So far nobody has mentioned the best thing about this album, which is the godlike genius of Mark Lanegan.

    Posted by sickboi on 2005-10-17 12:21:39

    Wow, what a shitty review.

    Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 12:03 PM (EDT)

    you give a good score and a shit review for a classic record. maybe it'd help those open minded few if you explained why the record is worth checking out. lazy wanker.

    Posted by fox82 on 2005-10-17 10:57:12
    My Score:

    I tried to like this record, 'Feel good hit of the summer' was more amusing than interesting (what's so cool about some stoner-come-chemical-freak yelling co-co-co-co-co-co-co-caine?). The only good thing about this is that Nick Oliveri is still awesome after all these years and Josh Homme fucked Tim Armstrong's wife, making him the coolest bastard in my book. For the time being. Meh.

    Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 7:32 AM (EDT)
    My Score:

    this is so overrated

    Posted by Crookedsuperhero on 2005-10-17 07:22:25

    Isn't this the same lame guy who won't download a single mp3 before he buys an album and then complains when other people do?

    Seems you suck at most things.

    Posted by localh on 2005-10-17 04:22:16

    where are all the Wesley Willis reviews?

    Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 4:11 AM (EDT)

    one of the worst reviews on this site. seriously, you hated them when they were all over the radio two years ago, but now you love 'em? haha

    Posted by joeg on 2005-10-16 22:52:52

    "I may not be the most studied and articulate 21 year old but I have a sense of "good" music."

    huh? how articulate to have to be describe 1 SONG? maybe like "this rock. this roll. this groovy! this heavy!"

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 10:22 PM (EDT)

    not to regret. i think the problem most people have is, you didnt really review the album...at all

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 10:17 PM (EDT)
    My Score:

    Haha, what the fuck was that thing about Skinhead Rob and Jerry Only two comments back?

    Well, score is for it because it made me laugh harder than anything else this week.

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 10:09 PM (EDT)
    My Score:

    What was I thinking? I submitted this like 5 months ago. I guess i'm a "fanboy" when it comes to Josh Homme. But I hear alot of comments that people don't like hearing "song-by-song" reviews. The idea was to inform people who have heard of QOTSA but never listened to this record. If I wanted to force my opinion on you I would have told you my favorite songs on here (such as In the Fade). Fuck what's "punk" or not, this is just damn good music. I may not be the most studied and articulate 21 year old but I have a sense of "good" music.

    -Not-To-Regret

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 9:57 PM (EDT)

    Hi Everyone, This is Lindsey Nagle, Skinhead Rob spokewoman reporting from beautiful downtown Los Angeles. We all know there is still ill feelings over the Armstrong-Dalle divorce.

    Skinhead Rob wants all of his fans to know how he feels about this Queens Of The Stone Age Review on punknews.org. Skinhead Rob had this to say, "Yo, I ain't down wit dis. Y'all see what dis dib to Tim, right? Well to get back at Josh, everytime I go to the dentist or Mr.Cartoon's, I bust out the Mad Libs and crib out Josh name out YO! It also helps me wit da rimes! Hey I sell drugs! Seacrest Out!"

    We caught up with punk pioneer Jerry Only he had this to say, "Um, like, whos dat? I was eating a slice in New Jersey and you bother me wid dish shit? Why is a skinhead rapping? Lemme ged dis straight?A rappin' skinhead with clown tattoos?I gotta go count my loot from da merchandice, before Glenn wants to become my friend"

    Posted by joeg on 2005-10-16 21:00:14

    i say just stop doing a "classic review" day but continue to include the best (or the marginaly acceptable?) of the classics with the current reviews, 3 times a week. that way you filter out garbage like this.

    Posted by superdude on 2005-10-16 20:46:22

    This review was pretty good, but here's how I would make it better:

    1. Where do I begin?

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 7:30 PM (EDT)

    It's kind of mind boggling to see paltry and completely insubstantial "reviews" like this on this site and know that there are piles of reviews just sitting in the queue that get passed over three times a week.

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 4:08 PM (EDT)

    wow. this review is hilarious.

    there are two qualities that make "short reviews" work well. this one got the "short" part down, but didnt include a "review"

    Posted by kenjamin on 2005-10-16 15:39:06

    this album deserves a 9 or a 10 because its that good

    I wasn't talking about this album because I think QOTSA are a memorable band. I'm talking about people who write reviews of late 90s Blink 182 clone pop punk bands and stuff and then slap a 9 on for the score. Like when I listen to mxpx, I can't help feeling warm, thinking about hanging out with my first female friend when I was 14 and skateboarding and shit. I'm not going to write some nostalgia cum review for mxpx though. They suck.

    Posted by the_other_scott on 2005-10-16 15:32:10

    this album deserves a 9 or a 10 because its that good

    when a band manages to be unique and listenable its pretty impressive, to me at least

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 3:24 PM (EDT)

    Kenjamin is right.

    Posted by kenjamin on 2005-10-16 14:27:02

    People really need to stop being such fanboys when writing reviews. Just because you enjoyed the band in high school doesn't mean it's deserving of a 9 or a 10. Get over your nostalgia.

    Posted by gregs on 2005-10-16 13:46:40

    "If any of you were to actually step foot into the cesspool that's currently pre-2005 reviews in the queue, you'd drown. There's so little worth posting we're probably either discontinuing this very, very soon or using the space to post 2005 reviews."

    I love the idea of an extra day of older reviews, but I vote to discontinue it if the backlog is really this bad

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 1:34 PM (EDT)
    My Score:

    "and for open-minded individuals like us"

    Score is for how much this line made me laugh. I come to this site because to read the hilariously stupid opinions of the most elitist bunch of ass-holes in the punk music world.

    Posted by CherryColaRain on 2005-10-16 13:03:38

    Holy shit. I just noticed there is not a single 2005 review right now. We are really running out of ideas or bands. Or maybe we are all way to lazy to actually write reviews of new bands that have their efforts this year. I for one did submit a 2005 review...I Am The Avalanche's self titled debut. It was a horrible review I must admit. But I goddamn tried.

    Posted by the_other_scott on 2005-10-16 13:02:12

    feel good hit of the summer does still pwn (assuming that that's a good thing)

    lost art of keeping a secret is one of my favortie songs ever

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 12:53 PM (EDT)

    Feel Good Hit of the Summer still pwns

    Posted by Anchors on 2005-10-16 12:41:24

    I'm going to start writing more of those classic reviews.

    Well, I tell myself this, getting it done is another matter entirely.

    Posted by the_other_scott on 2005-10-16 12:41:09

    this record is tits!
    go buy it

    Posted by Dante3000 on 2005-10-16 12:38:46

    So I can assume from your comment, Brian, that there are reviews that are worse than this one. That being the case should I even bother submitting older reviews or should I just basically consider it a lost cause?
    -Dante
    P.S. Of course the ever declining quality of the "classic reviews" would explain how not one but two of mine got posted, awesome.

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 12:37 PM (EDT)

    granted, the review may have been short and not in the highest of quality. but this album does kick some serious ass, people. you just gotta give it a spin...

    nicotine valium vicodin marijuana extasy and alcohol c-c-c-c-c-cocaine.

    Posted by inagreendase on 2005-10-16 11:43:52

    If any of you were to actually step foot into the cesspool that's currently pre-2005 reviews in the queue, you'd drown. There's so little worth posting we're probably either discontinuing this very, very soon or using the space to post 2005 reviews.

    Posted by CherryColaRain on 2005-10-16 11:35:52
    My Score:

    "Where in the hell did that quality control button go..."

    And the 10 is for this comment. Not because of the band it was intended towards, but it because it came just at the right time and gave me a chuckle.

    Posted by CherryColaRain on 2005-10-16 11:33:53
    My Score:

    I got a friend who can't quit rambling about this CD. He, mind you, is a die hard Queens Of the Stone Ages fan and I believe he flew to the states for 2 days just to see this band live (..We Live in Mexico. No, not all people who live in mexico talk about chile and mariachis) So for a band to have that big of an impulse on a listener gains my respect. hell If I had the money I would surely fly to the states to watch a Blood Brothers concert anyday. I'm no particular fan of this type of music. But hey, if someone who went on a over 4 hour plane ride JUST to see this band its gotta count for something...right?

    Posted by maverick on 2005-10-16 10:50:37

    Where in the hell did that quality control button go...

    -Scott

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 9:05 AM (EDT)
    My Score:

    "Why the fuck is this useless band being "reviewed" on PunkNews?"

    QOTSA are ten times more punk than some of the crappy emo boybands that regularly get posted on this site. You clearly have shitty music taste if you choose to complain about this instead of all the My Chemical Romance clones who get news posted here. Queens are too musically diverse to be a straight-up punk band, but a lot of their stuff is heavily influenced by bands like Black Flag, the Stooges, GBH, Subhumans, Dead Kennedys, Misfits and the Buzzcocks, so try knowing what you're talking about before you whine about what should be on the site or not.

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 3:10 AM (EDT)

    Hope you didn't overexert yourself on this one buddy.

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 2:32 AM (EDT)

    Why the fuck is this useless band being "reviewed" on PunkNews?

    Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 16, 2005 at 2:32 AM (EDT)

    what a horrible review. why dont they filter shit like this out?

    Posted by clamum on 2005-10-16 02:31:43

    Ok, for this to be a review there needs to be comments on the music. So there the fuck are they? Can any idiot just submit pointless bullshit and call it a review?

    Posted by etwiels88 on 2005-10-16 02:05:42

    Reminds me of Filters album cover

    http://g-images.amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/47/fd/23a5b2c 008a09759c69e1010.L.jpg

    Posted by Dante3000 on 2005-10-16 01:20:21
    My Score:

    I like this album. This review, however, seems to approach the reader from the angle that they must already know about QOTSA and this album. Sure lotsa people heard about Songs (and why not it was fucking good), But this isn't that album. There should have been much more detail in this review since the "hit" on this album was "Lost Art of Keeping a Secret" (or "feel Good Hit of the Summer") which wasn't all that well known at all. Seems like a cheap move just to push a Queens review into the archieves.
    -Dante

    Posted by Godfather on 2005-10-16 00:57:54
    My Score:

    no one knows

    Posted by TheNightProwler on 2005-10-16 00:36:35
    My Score:

    I thought this album was shit, I actually bought this when it first came out when it was really cheap but I just couldn't get into it.

    Of course that was years ago so I really wonder if listening to it again would make me find anything I didn't notice back then.

    Posted by joeg on 2005-10-16 00:19:59

    brilliant review

    Posted by gladimnotemo on 2005-10-16 00:16:35
    My Score:

    I really dig this band. The new one is a lot slower, but still good.

    Posted by Anchors on 2005-10-16 00:14:47

    You only wrote one line that had anything to do with the actual album.

    I don't even know.

    Posted by AlmostPunkEnough on 2005-10-16 00:12:15
    My Score:

    my favorite QOTSA disc. they never quite lived up to the potential of this album, though 'Songs for the Deaf' was almost as great.