FeaturesContestsReviews
| Neon BlondeChandeliers in the Savannah2005 Dim Mak
Review by: Matt Whelihan See others by this writer Only registered users can post comments Published on December 22nd 2005
I know I said before that Neon Blonde was essentially an electronic side project for Blood Brothers members Johnny Whitney and Mark Gajadhar, but after digesting the convulsive twisting beast that is Chandeliers in the Savannah, I realize that description not only fails to do the band justice, but also screams of incorrectness. While Neon Blonde is indeed a side project for Whitney and Gajadhar, their electronic tendencies are far from dominant. Instead, the programmed beats and synth created beeps are merely one tactic the band has chosen to employ. As their songs teeter on the brink of chaos, playing like soundtracks for urban decay and post-apocalypse, you will find that the duo are just as adroit at kicking out some avant noise guitar spasms or ballad suggesting piano lines, as they are glitchy dance freakouts.
Please login or register to post comments. What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
How is that review "flamebait?" Flamebait is meaninglessly trying to rile people up, the review was honestly saying that the record sucked because it wasn't punk. Okay, whatever, but that's about all it said. If you're going to devastate a record in a review, make sure to say why. Will, i thought someone like you would be able to see through flamebait. And you like the hives AND the yeah yeah yeahs? The Head Wound City EP is really good, spastic hardcore. Remember when some know-nothing reviewed the Yeah Yeah Yeahs album and called it an "indie trend?" That was one of the low points of this web site. the Blood Brothers and everything else connected to them is AWFUL. While not on my best of lists or anything, this definetly is a solid effort. This album is awesome. In my top 5 for the year fuck the blood brothers....its all about coheed and cambria?!?!?! hahahahah 4? ehhh. I couldn't find a reason to play this again once it was over I was almost dissapointed, when I heard that this was the Blood Bros. but it does grow on you. A very good realease. However, I doubt it could ever out do anything The Blood Brothers have ever done and will do. As for Bilile I heard a while ago he himself had a side project called Head Wound City along with some dudes from The Locust. I heard one song and it blew me away. It seems that Jordan took the hardcore of The Blood Brothers and Johnny took the dancable. Awesome record! One of the best of the year! This is a really good album. They really emphasize the funky sort of groove that Blood Brothers hint at on some songs. Dance music for hipsters! is this band worse than the blood brothers? I think he quite clearly stated that this isn't electronic music. electronic music? no thanks. punk was supposed to be the disco killer. I personally love the song "Chandeliers and Vines". It's a great album if you take the time to listen to it a few times. It kind of grows on you. My #1 of 2005. It's stunning. very good album. very good review. Great review Matt; and I agree, it really is an impressive record. ehh it's okay One of the greatest albums of 2005. The reviewer is right, these songs are so damn catchy but they don't reveal their catchiness until at least three of four spins. A talented duo indeed. The album is a very good listen that becomes a great one when you think about it and examine it. No talk about "Headlines" is blasphemy considering it's the single from the album and also the best track. |