Punknews.orgPunknews.org Logo
Review Navigator

BackForward

Features

 

Contests

 


Reviews



Liquor? Check. Guns? Check. Playing cards? Check. Down-on-your-luck album title? Check. Didn’t think Social Distortion had a new record out? Well, you’re right, they don’t, it is only 2006 after all. These images belong to Texas band Born to Lose and their latest effort, Sweet Misery.

The case with most street punk albums is you get what you pay for. You know going into the record you aren’t to get virtuoso musicianship, deep introspective lyrics, biting political prose, awkward time signatures or instruments you can’t pronounce. This album is no exception; in fact, it is without a single exceptional quality at all. What you would hope for are fist-pumping anthems, catchy lyrics and a memorable melody or two. Sadly all you get with Sweet Misery is Born to Lose’s approximations of what those things might be.

For the first three songs it is like the band got together and said “how can we avoid being completely coma inducing without putting forth any actual effort?” and they came up with the solution. They decided they would throw “whoa-oh” into the chorus of each song almost arbitrarily, and have them be devoid of real strong melody. By keeping the same pattern of repeated lines coupled with said "whoa-oa"s in each chorus, not only are they dull to begin with but extremely monotonous being clumped together. Tracks 2 and 3, “Salvation” and the title track, respectively, both start off with guitar intros that do make attempts to liven things up. Unfortunately the title song is the only one of the two that is actually rocking with slight rockabilly flair. The "whoa"s continue to plague the album for its entire duration.

Themes the band covers in their lyrics reoccur: dealing with struggle, redemption, love and friendship/brotherhood. For the most part the songs are devoid of remarkable lines, resorting to ABCD rhymes and tired clichés. Take for instance the first four lines in “Paid Up:”

You say opinions are like assholes,
Well everyone’s so full of shit,

You say my future is the past now,
Well I won’t hear a word of it
Sometimes clichés aren’t all that harmful to the listening experience if they are delivered in convincing manner, but Chris Klinck’s drunken slur is not very inspiring. When Born to Lose steps outside their lyrical paths and tries an overtly political song in “New Babylon” they are reduced to tired sloganeering.

The band has a few moments on the album where everything comes together for an enjoyable listen. For instance there is the catchy dust-in-the-windish number “Place and Time” as well as the hometown pride / road story of “Along the Way” which has some nice personal touches in the lyrics. Still, two really strong songs in a 12-song album just isn't very convincing. This record seems somewhat futile, in that this year alone there was many other far superior releases in this genre of music. If you’re a fan of this type of music I suggest the new Street Dogs, Ducky Boys or Angel City Outcasts albums before you check this out.



People who liked this also liked:
NOFX - The DeclineConverge - No HeroesShook Ones - Facetious Folly FeatBad Astronaut - Twelve Small Steps, One Giant DisappointmentMelvins - A Senile AnimalThe Lost Patrol - AutomaticLamb of God - SacramentThe Static Age - Blank ScreensFifth Hour Hero - Not Revenge...Just a Vicious CrushGrimple - Up Your Ass



Please login or register to post comments.
What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
  • Share your opinion by posting comments on the stories that interest you
  • Rate music and bands and help shape the weekly top ten
  • Let Punknews.org use your ratings to help you find bands and albums you might like
  • Customize features on the site to get the news the way you want.

    Posted by jaysmall13 on 2007-01-28 12:29:54

    this album is sick sweet misery is an great song

    Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 18, 2006 at 8:28 PM (EST)
    My Score:

    I agree with this review in a way but a 4, COME ON, If this was a test this band would have got a 40 percent in the viewers eyes, unbeleivable.

    Posted by JonDaley on 2006-11-17 23:04:02

    how did I come across as Pitchfork Boy, Ness? I'm not sure they would have liked Ducky Boys or ACO who I mention as enjoying a great deal. Take a look at the bands I like and albums I have in my top ten nothing pitchfork there.

    Posted by JonDaley on 2006-11-17 22:56:37

    "modern" by modern I mean not as directly linked to Oi. You are talking about Bad Religion here. Saying a modern punk band is influenced by BR is like a band saying The Beatles influenced them or something. A clue, get one. You admitted the Rancid influence who are arguablly a street punk band but then when yiou attacked me you chose to overlook that. Just because I don't like some third rate bar band doesn't mean I'm not fit to review.

    Posted by feeeding5000 on 2006-11-17 17:28:25

    Blecch. I hate most streetpunk, and I mean HATE, especially the pop-punk bands that dress up in studded jackets and mohawks and think that they're so cool (ie Rancid, etc). Some oi! I like, but only if it's catchy or anthemic.

    Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 17, 2006 at 5:16 PM (EST)

    "modern street punk doesn't always mean oi, there is often a pub rock/hard rock influence which the Motorhead comment. I don't hear Bad Religion at all and Rancid well some of their non-ska tinged material is street punk leaning. The "woah-ohs" and chanted choruses are all street punk staples."

    I don't know what the hell 'modern street punk' is or what 'old school street punk is. But if you're missing the Bad Religion influence in Born to Lose's sound then you probably aren't qualified to review punk music in a public forum.

    Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 17, 2006 at 3:56 PM (EST)
    My Score:

    "I may be a punker, but fucking hate street/oi punk. That shit sucks (in my opinion)."
    That is because you are too busy loving the cock.
    This album is cool, nothing earthshaking, but cool. If you like Social D. you will dig this.

    Posted by Ike_Ness on 2006-11-17 15:36:48

    Good job. You came across as more of a pretentious wank in this review than in most of your other reviews! This band was given an unfair chance because of Pitchfork boy here...

    Posted by GlassPipeMurder on 2006-11-17 13:53:25
    My Score:

    score is for bouncing souls and johnny thunders

    Posted by JonDaley on 2006-11-17 12:48:18

    modern street punk doesn't always mean oi, there is often a pub rock/hard rock influence which the Motorhead comment. I don't hear Bad Religion at all and Rancid well some of their non-ska tinged material is street punk leaning. The "woah-ohs" and chanted choruses are all street punk staples.

    Posted by WyldCannon on 2006-11-17 12:36:47

    Neil: You see me doin' thrill-seeker liquor store holdups with a "Born to Lose" tattoo on my chest?

    Vincent: No, I do not.

    Neil: Right.

    thats my feelings.

    Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 17, 2006 at 11:51 AM (EST)

    I don't consider this record to be street punk at all. It comes across as more of Bad Religion/Rancid mixed with Motorhead/GNR. They have more in common with Angel City Outcasts than they do with Street Dogs or anything "oi". I think the author of this review is making unfair associations because he/she has determined that Sailor's Grave is somehow a street punk label when that's not entirely true. This record is well worth checking out if you like anthemic rock n' roll. I'd score this one a notch above ACO in my opinion.

    Posted by SilentStorms on 2006-11-17 11:30:16

    I may be a punker, but fucking hate street/oi punk. That shit sucks (in my opinion).

    Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 17, 2006 at 8:49 AM (EST)

    Born to Lose...Now that's an original name. Never heard that associated with punk rock before....ever

    Posted by JonDaley on 2006-11-17 02:36:34

    even if I was being conservative in my review a 9 is extreme for this. Maybe I was bing a little harsh but there just isn't anything that memorable here and I generally like this kind fo music.

    Posted by Mute98 on 2006-11-17 01:35:52

    listen to the guy below me, its a great cd..

    Posted by american_666_jesus on 2006-11-17 01:25:20
    My Score:

    This was a much stronger release than the review suggests. While it does not forge too much new ground, it is a very anthemetic album and a lot of fun to listen to. While i do recommend you get the new Street Dogs, Ducky Boys, and Angel City Outcast records as well, don't pass this one up.

    Posted by danperrone on 2006-11-17 01:23:16

    born to run > born to lose