FeaturesContestsReviews
| Angel Eyes...And for a Roof a Sky Full of Stars.2007 Underground Communiqué
Review by: Anchors See others by this writer Angel Eyes @ MySpace (link) Only registered users can post comments Published on August 7th 2007
The best albums are often the albums that come out of nowhere.
Please login or register to post comments. What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
To Anchors: won't be getting this but really nice to see anchors reviewing again - always an interesting read Hahaha, I just haven't reviewed a lot in general this year. Alright Anchors! Looks like you're reviewing stuff I like again. Thank god as you introduced me to a lot of great stuff, but then last year happened. All is forgotten. All hail Anchors and Brian! 27 minutes for 2 songs? jesus. the world is not at these guys feet cos alot of people are never going to buy into that @elephantdwarf: thanks Jordan! I think the review makes sense after you've heard the record... epic, powerful, gorgeous, ferocious all at once, tension, subtle ambience and ferocious explosions, eerie calm, reserved moments, catostrophic turn, shredding his vocal chords in two, sense of calm. demure, destructive, rhythm that never lets go, foreboding feedback, slow, melodic rhythm, rising and falling drum fills, brooding and dramatic, searing vocals,frenzied pitch, brooding rhythm, Dark and powerful, Isis clones, dark overtones, incredibly intense vocals, brooding tones. i find it a bit irritating and pretentious when a reviewer doesn't describe an album's sound, but in fairness to anchors, it isn't very hard to click on the fucking myspace link. The dude who runs this label punched matt skiba once cult of luna and mouth of the architect also come to mind. and i'm saying this since i own angel eye's first album. but it's just my opinion on the matter. but on another note any band named after a character lee van cleef played is going to be fucking badass no matter what. ummm... i totally read an entire paragraph at least about the album's sound. i find it a bit irritating and pretentious when a reviewer doesn't describe an album's sound, but in fairness to anchors, it isn't very hard to click on the fucking myspace link. buried inside is amazing. im really looking forward to a new album. good dudes too. If I compare bands to other bands, I get bitched at about not being able to write without comparison, and if write without comparisons I get asked why I didn't make any. *with a dash Neur-Isis-core with dash of his hero is gone. Yeah, it's good to know that you enjoyed it and all, but if I've never heard of these guys a frame of reference would be nice. can you give me some idea what this sounds like....? genre or band comparison or something? No, it's not screamo. There's screamy vocals, but they're a lot more thick and powerful than any vocalist in the screamo genre is known for and they're used a lot more sparingly. Screamo? Because if it's screamo, just call it that. I refuse to buy anything called, "post-rock", yet I am very susceptible to screamo. |