FeaturesContestsReviews
| GoldfingerHello Destiny2008 SideOneDummy
Review by: elmojito See others by this writer Simon Fogg Website (link) Only registered users can post comments Published on January 16th 2009
Goldfinger and I haven’t really got along since their pop-punk animal rights protest Open Your Eyes. Most people were put off by their didactic tone, but it was their sheer ineloquence that aggravated me. Although their first two albums were nigh on perfect, frontman and lyricist John Feldmann suddenly seemed totally unable to write a sentiment about his melodramatic personal conflicts, let alone broach a sensitive topic like animal rights. Instead of inspiring, he came across as preachy, and I don’t doubt many borderline vegetarians got out their bows and arrows and hit the woods out of pure spite after hearing that album.
Please login or register to post comments. What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
It's not so much a "holier than thou" attitude as it is about being a bleeding heart for a cause that most folks don't consider important. Any musician who writes songs about animal rights almost immediately falls under scrutiny and misperception. "Look, I am a vegetarian and have been for 7 years. I chose to live that way. However, I won't cut myself from everybody who doesn't think like me. John Feldman is a motherfucking asshole and Peta is no better in many ways." "The idea that songs about animal rights should be poeticized and presented in a respectful manner for carnivores is stupid." I like Goldfinger and I love meat. I never really got the hate for "Open Your Eyes"; it's no different from Stomping Ground. incredibly mediocre album, and this was supposed to be their "comeback" record, with Charlie returning to the fold, no longer being on a major label and putting it out via the old-school band revivalist label, SideOneDummy. I agree Goldfinger isn't good anymore, but this reviewer has his loin cloth in a bunch because John Feldmann tells kids eating meat is bad. The idea that songs about animal rights should be poeticized and presented in a respectful manner for carnivores is stupid. Great review, shithouse album. Liked the first half of the album, but the second half is totally mediocre and forgettable. As a result, I've only listened to it a few times. This review nails everything Goldfinger did right and everything they did wrong on this album. Well done. I see a review as the combing of an argument (your opinion) and summarizing (with details). He's really heavy on the former, and not strong enough with the latter. Not to mention his argument is a little TOO specific. "So, you're saying that it's ok for a punk band to bitch about things and be crass and ineloquent so long as it isn't something that you do? If he is a vegetarian and for animal rights, he has every right to sing about it. Just because you don't agree doesn't make it a flaw with the music." I thought this was a pretty damn good review, actually. Yes, there is some clear bias, but this was much more substantial and interesting than a lot of the crap that makes it to the left sidebar. Give the guy some credit for putting some personality into it rather than resorting to cliches and pandering references. Hey, I ain't doggin' your opinion -- I respect anyone who puts their writing up at the risk of ridicule from punknews.org. "You only have opinions on things you publish as reviews?" Well I haven't reviewed anything of theirs yet "So, Goldfinger is too ineloquent, but Propagandhi and their "go vegan or go fuck yourself" doesn't cause the same problem?" "I actually quite like Propagandhi, for whoever asked." The animal rant thing is a little too irrelevant to the album as a whole. straight up trash. Ok, as the asshole who wrote this review, I feel I should join the comments section. I think this is a good review. Dont see what all the fuss is about. Very good point about punk being imposing when it is criticizing something you do actively. Scores for the review, and score is inverse of what I imagine the album being. This is a solid pop-punk album. Open Your Eyes had to be the most annoying/high horse song hahahaha, is this first paragraph serious? Scratch that, is this whole review serious? I know it's about his son and all, but "Julian" is one of the worst songs I've ever heard. Score is for the song. didn't this record come out like ten years ago? what i find really amusing is checking out what the people who talk the most shit have in their top ten lists and wondering how the fuck they can say anything. this band has always been great live, some of the better "punk" musicians working today but the lyrics are consistently awful. Black President shouldn't even be mentioned in this review considering they bear no resemblance whatsoever...oh yeah, and this reviewer is missing the point ENTIRELY. wow, what a shitty review, no constructive argumentation whatsoever. get up, goodbye and free kevin jonas are absolutely kickass songs. As much as we love to here your insane opinions on what okay to sing about in punk rock, why don't you just review the fucking album. This is not only offensive, it's also just a crap review. I don't know how anyone is suppose to take these opinions seriously. This Album Sucks! With that said there is nothing more UN punk rock than bitching about someones opinion, so for all you "punks" complaining about this review shut up and listen to the album for your selves and formulate your own opinion if you don't like the opinion of the reviewer. I actually think Open Your Eyes was the last good record they did. This one was really disappointing except for like... three songs. I haven't listened to it since the week I actually bought it. It's pretty much predictable Goldfinger the entire time. What a let down. we get it, you disagree with feldman. who cares? excellent review. completely agree. This record is probably terrible, but I haven't heard it. "Stupid review clearly written by a asshole. Stupid review clearly written by a asshole. "I can't even imagine what you think of Propagandhi" This band gets way too much shit. WTF are you serious 2nd most horrible album of 2008, right behind (or would that be in front of?) The Red Album. Score is for "but I’d rather barbecue an entire petting zoo" BUT...how great is "Superman" in Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1? For that matter how great is whole damn soundtrack?!?! Wow, way to be 8 months late in reviewing this. This band has had zero credibility since day one. I can't believe they're still going. anyone who thinks this band's first two albums are perfect should be dragged out into the street and shot. That being said, anyone who thinks they should "return to their roots" should go check out that Electric Love Hogs album to see what their roots really are. "It’s all well and good moaning about the government and the media, but what if you imply that a fundamental aspect of life that you take for granted is actually evil -- an aspect that you actually take pleasure in and have no intention to alter." And frankly, the fight for animal rights doesn't indicate a flaw. If anything, it is EXACTLY what the punk rock spirit is about. Standing by your unpopular views even in the face of almost total disagreement. So, you're saying that it's ok for a punk band to bitch about things and be crass and ineloquent so long as it isn't something that you do? If he is a vegetarian and for animal rights, he has every right to sing about it. Just because you don't agree doesn't make it a flaw with the music. there's a couple memorable songs on this disc, the rest is garbage test! I listened to it once, thought 'this isnt as bad as the last few albums' but I never had the urge to listen to it again The fist half of this album was pretty all right. Not bad, not bad. fighting diatribe with diatribe. after a couple of mediocre records I found this to be quite good. So what about the music? I guess my reviews aren't good enough for punknews anymore! Oh well... Eh, I thought this album was decent. http://altpress.com/reviews/1252.htm |