- Home
- Submit News
- Bands
- Streams
- Best New Music
- Interviews
- Tours
- Reviews
- New Releases
- Contact Us
- Login
The ReplacementsThe Replacements: HootenannyHootenanny (1983)Rhino Reviewer Rating: 4 User Rating: Contributed by: scientistrockscientistrock (others by this writer | submit your own) In 1982, the Replacements were Minneapolis' hometown indie heroes. There latest release, Stink, simultaneously lampooned and emulated much of the then-burgeoning hardcore scene of the time. But that wasn't really them. These four had too much classic rock in them for the hardcore scene, but too much.
In 1982, the Replacements were Minneapolis' hometown indie heroes. There latest release, Stink, simultaneously lampooned and emulated much of the then-burgeoning hardcore scene of the time. But that wasn't really them. These four had too much classic rock in them for the hardcore scene, but too much snottiness to fit in anywhere else. And between October of 1982 and January 1983 they let it all hang out in some "a warehouse in some godawful suburb north of Mpls." The result of those sessions is Hootenanny.
Please login or register to post comments.What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
The last worthwhile mats record. Avoid 'let it be suckage' and evertyhing else afterward and your ears will go home happy! This one was the first hints and signs of the sellout that was 'let it be suckage'. You have a few songs here that are still reminiscent of their' 'stin'k and 'sorry ma' records which were infinitely better. Don't Tell A Soul is just as good as Tim. There. I said it. actually, big-ups to the reviewer for reviewing this (and having what i assume is a minutemen inspired screen name). i hadn't played this in a while and this inspired me to break it out again. it still rules. Score's for how handsome the reviewer is. This, "Tim" & "Let It Be" ARE the Replacements for me. Yeah it's weird that the sentence with the most advanced vocabulary also has such a simple and obvious grammatical mistake, and at the very beginning too: that should have been a 9. over the years i have grown to love this record. yeah, their tongues are definitely in their cheeks, but i don't think it's really a joke per se. they're not taking themselves too terribly seriously, but it doesn't detract from the quality of the songs. within your reach and color me impressed are two of their all time best songs, i will argue that run in is their best full-on punk songs, and even stuff like lovelines is really entertaining. it's just a fun, fun record, chock full of great song-writing. weird. i was just reading our bandd could be your life and im on the replacements chapter You dont "huff" cocaine you snort it Good review, though In 1982 they were punk heroes...indie didn't really exist yet as a genre even though plenty of hardcore bands were putting out music on independent labels. I like the majority of what this band did. Score's for how handsome the reviewer is. I'll give ya minimum effort for a minimum wage. hey, it's better than the post Tim stuff! Ugh. Fucking grammar, man. Score's for how handsome the reviewer is. |
Previous
Exclusive StreamsSponsored EventsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteContributing EditorsBryne Yancey Kira Wisniewski Brittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Armando Olivas John Flynn Chris Moran John GentileCopy EditorAmelia ClinePodcast ProducerNariman ShariatPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2013 Punknews.orgTerms of Use Privacy Policy Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us About Punknews.org Other Places to Go |









@sean,
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion Yours just happens to be wrong.