Your new album, Axe To Fall seems more technical than previous albums. What were your thoughts on the final product? Do you also see it as being a more technical or just a logical progression from your previous work?

Kurt Ballou: I think it's both really. It's definitely more technical, not in all songs, but certain songs. It's part of that logical progression that within heavy music as time goes on, all the easy riffs have already been taken. As a band we always strive to innovate and not read ourselves too much. We tried to still maintain a sound that is the essence of Converge without putting out the same record over and over again. A lot of bands get kind of wrapped up in the so called "album cycle." They want to release an album every 18 months and they have a touring cycle they need to do because it's their jobs. For us we're not 100% dependent on Converge for income and we don't really treat this like… well, I guess we kind of treat it like a job a little bit. But it's something we'd be doing something regardless if we made money from it. It's a very cathartic thing for us and part of that is to always be pushing forward and always finding new ways to express ourselves. You can't write "Iron Man" today in 2009 because Black Sabbath already took that stuff. We need to write stuff that requires a little more thought and technical prowess. It's definitely the hardest record we've ever had guitar wise and playing some of these new songs live it's definitely difficult to move around because I have to focus on getting through the song.

Everyone in the band seems very technically proficient at their respective instruments. Did any of you guys ever have any formal training or was it something you picked up along the way and just messed around with?

Ballou: I never had guitar lessons. Nate never did either. Maybe he had one or two as a kid, but I never had any really. My dad played a little bit of guitar, he never really taught me anything, but he did give me a chord book. I had played saxophone and piano prior to it, so I sort of transferred my musical knowledge over to guitar. I think Ben was auditioning for music schools, but he never went. We're all just students of the artists we like who we spent listening to while we were younger and attempting to mimic what we heard on these records. When you do that you develop your ear a lot more than when you take lessons. Lessons seem to focus more on the dexterity of playing, whereas people who are self-taught have to use their ears more to decipher what they're hearing. I think you become a more observant player that way and you also start to learn how an ensemble interacts with each other. That being said, it also forces us to reinvent the wheel a lot. There's a lot of things we could've learned that would have accelerated our musical growth. I don't think we did a truly good record till Jane Doe, which was in 2001 and we've been around since 1991 so in my opinion that is ten years of sucking. In the end I think it was a blessing though because we were so stubborn, idealistic or lazy, the fact that we learned to play on our own so slowly it caused us all to develop our own style.

I've got to respectfully disagree; I really enjoy Petitioning The Empty Sky…

Ballou: I think there are glimmers of good stuff in the first ten years, but there's nothing, there's no records that I'm really proud of start to finish. There aren't any songs I'm proud of start to finish. There are good riffs, but if I had them around today I feel I could focus them into a better song. Converge is challenging to listen to if you're not familiar with the certain genre, but what I've learned to do over time is to take those inaccessible harsh sounds and put them into a more accessible song format. Not because we're trying to be a pop band or anything. Like to me a song used to be like ten, fifteen or twenty riffs per song, but now there's only three or four that are assembled more in a verse chorus, bridge chorus kind of way. Even though they're weird riffs, they have a more memorable format.

It seems in general your recent albums have been more finely tuned packages (No Heroes, Jane Doe). You can definitely tell there's a major transition from album to album.

Ballou: Well we usually take a few years from record to record, because especially as we've gotten older as people… when you're 17 or 18 or whatever, you're changing really fast. Over a course of 6 months you might become a different person. When you're in your 30s like we are now, it takes a lot longer to evolve as a person and music is really a reflection of your own humanity. If you're trying to put out a record every year in your 30s you as a person aren't really changing that much from year to year. So it's not likely you'd have a lot new to offer musically if you put out records that frequently. We want to wait a few years between records and make sure every song on the record is the best song we could have written at a time and giving our listeners the most premium material we can offer.

The band has been embraced by a bunch of different scenes over the years, such as the hardcore scene and you've always touched on the punk elements as well. Even lately you guys have gotten attention from some "indie rock" publications; BrooklynVegan and Pitchfork has given you guys a bunch of coverage. Do you think that crossover has been helpful in pushing the band to its current level of notoriety?

Ballou: I think we definitely walk a lot of fences as people and as musicians in terms of our own personal interests in music. We're certainly appreciative of a lot of different kinds of sounds. I also think that genre names are things for marketing people and journalists and not something a band should concern itself with. It's your job to report on music and you need a language that can convey in words what something sounds like, but a musician is not constrained by those words. A musician can make something sound like what it is. We don't feel the need to confine ourselves to a particular genre; we confine ourselves to stay within our own abilities, the large umbrella that is the Converge sound. We're not going to push it so far that we're not going to be able to do strongly. The ethos that drives the band and the scene we all grew up in is definitely the hardcore scene. We identify ourselves as more of a hardcore band than anything else because that's the community where we come from and we cut our teeth and a lot of early show going experiences are from there. I feel like as people we can relate to hardcore kids a lot better than most other people. Even though we may be into metal or country or indie or whatever, I think because we were born out of the hardcore scene our first love is hardcore. There's a certain way hardcore kids get each other and relate to each other that maybe lacking in other forms of music. We just feel more comfortable in those kinds of environments. There's an ethos to hardcore I think we still embody in a lot of ways that's not understand outside of hardcore. Our approach is definitely hardcore, despite the fact that we're not constantly involved in playing with hardcore bands.

The latest Pitchfork review that came out called you guys "this generation's Black Flag." How do you personally feel about that label?

Ballou: I don't think we deserve that. Don't get me wrong - Black Flag is definitely one of the band's that's been inspiring us since we're 13 years old. We definitely strive to be musical pioneers as best as we can, but they were genre pioneers. They were touring pioneers. That was the band that went out and did things that no other band even thought of doing. Like I was saying earlier about Black Sabbath, they are one of the few originators of hardcore. I don't see how we could ever be revered quite at that level as them. But I definitely appreciate the compliment. I think in 20 or 30 years people will still remember Black Flag a lot more than Converge. I hope people remember us, but I don't think any hardcore band will achieve that same level of reverence as Black Flag, Minor Threat and Bad Brains.

The whole hardcore genre really seems to have changed I'm sure since you guys first started. I know you keep producing a lot of great bands within that scene. How do you feel about today's current status of hardcore?

Ballou: I think it's better now than it was in the 90s. I think in the 90s that's when hardcore went suburban and the metal influence came in a lot. Obviously there was a metallic influence in the late 80s with Cro-Mags, and Slapshot and Judge and Leeway and all these crossover bands such as Suicidal Tendencies. I think the suburban kids such as ourselves, we had that kind of hardcore influence from going to shows, but we were also the first generation that had MTV and Headbangers Ball. So we'd go to see Slapshot on the weekend or Bad Brains or whoever and come home and watch Headbangers Ball and see Slayer and Metallica. I think the 90s there was a lot of early attempts at fusing those things and a lot of it was really cheesy. A lot of that moshcore stuff that came out of the 90s was really bad. There's always going to be bad music, there's a lot of god awful terrible music now, there's a lot of god awful terrible music from the 80s, but I think with time a lot of the bad stuff gets forgotten about and the good stuff gets remembered so I think certain time periods get revered more than others.

Then in the 90s you also had these hardcore kids from suburbia…. like in the Black Flag era there were a lot kids who had no other choice but to be hardcore kids. They're urban kids, they're runaways, they're from broken homes, they're people that are suffering and desperately needed an outlet. It had nothing to do with fashion or anything like that. There's definitely some posturing going on, but it wasn't a fashionable thing, it was dangerous and it's just what these people were coming to do. That's not to say affluence precludes any kind of suffering, but it's a different kind of suffering that happens among suburban and upper middle class kids which is where hardcore starts to move in the 90s. So you have this new thing that starts to happen in the 90s called emocore, which is driven by people that don't have such a dangerous life. It's the classic suburban depression, kids who otherwise would have been into The Smiths or The Cure or even The Red House Painters and then started to form this more tempered music. When that term was coined, they were referring more to the D.C. scene, which is more like the intellectual side. There are a lot of politics in D.C. so you have a lot of politicians, lobbyists and other businesses in the area so you have a lot of intelligent people in the area who are having intelligent kids. So these kids are thinking more outwardly and more politically. So you have the Revolution Summer and the birth of Rites of Spring and later Fugazi and Moss Icon and these other kind of bands. All that stuff gets filtered of this kid who knows about hardcore and the metal they're playing on MTV and the result is the 90s screamo, sweater vest, horn rimmed glasses sort of scene and so little of that stuff was any good. And between that stuff sucking really bad and that early metallic stuff sucking really bad I think it took a really long time to flush itself out and become it's own thing than being a poorly played derivation of a lot of other things. Now that I think that evolution has happened it's refined and it's a higher caliber than it was in the 90s.

Another big difference in how the music has changed since when we started is the business. There's this constant access to music that we didn't have back then. It's not really better or worse, it's just different. We used to buy 7 inches and we used to take it and send it to your friend or your pen pal and you'd have to recycle your postage because there's no email yet or downloading so local scenes would develop a lot stronger. Bands from Boston tended to sound like each other because bands wouldn't go on tour very frequently so you'd end up playing with the same bands a lot and influencing each other more than bands across the country. So there's this Boston sound, this L.A. sound, this New York sound. But then downloading and MySpace starts coming up and it dilutes the local scene identity and it makes music a lot more competitive in all genres of music. There's so much out there and there's so much access to it so only the music that requires the shortest attention span that people will pay attention to. So if something doesn't have a great recording or a hook right away it's really easy to dismiss it and move on to something else. It used to be like I would go to the record store and buy a few CDs or records or tapes and even if I don't like it that much, I don't have that much music in my collection so I spend a lot of time with each record and getting to know it and it might rub off on me and I get to understand it. That kind of thing doesn't really happen anymore so it's a really different environment. Touring has become the same way as the scene has grown and people are able to make money touring. Everything has become a lot more lowest common denominator with regards to the tours that you do and the music that you write because people are thinking about their careers more than about expressing themselves. The fans support that mentality through their buying practices.

In a sense it's interesting though, it's almost a testament to you guys in a way because I think nowadays even though some people have short attention spans there are people who really want to discover bands and listen to the records over and over and get to great quality music. Even though there's so much access, really great music will end up prevailing and rise to the top.

Ballou: I also think we have a certain degree of insulation from that because we came up before that current environment of music and I think if Converge started today or five years ago we might not be in the same position we are now because we'd have to go through all that competition. I think some of that people can put it aside and check out what we're doing because we've been around a while now.

You've been on Epitaph for three albums now, how's your relationship with the label grown over the years? Will there be any future material through them?

Ballou: Well this is the last record in our contract so we'd have to negotiate something new but we feel a kindred spirit with those who work there. They're a really big label, but they're still an independent label so ethically we stand behind what they do. A lot of people seem to have the mentality that a label makes the band, but that's not the case for us or how they work. They just empower us to do what we do. They don't ever tell us to put out a record or go on this tour or do this album cover or T-shirt design or anything like that. They are completely hands off with our scheduling and our artistic decision-making. There's always a little discussion, but they're just there to back us up.

You're currently on tour with Dethlok, Mastodon and High on Fire. Any chances of a headlining tour in the near future?

Ballou: We have some international plans after this tour and then in the spring we'll probably do a U.S. headlining tour. We're just trying to put together a good package and at this point in our lives trying to avoid winter and U.S. summer touring. Summer tours are really competitive and winter tour is just dangerous and you get sick so we'd mostly be doing spring or fall type stuff.

You're still producing some records in the spare time. What are some records that people should be looking forward to?

Ballou: I did the new Trap Them record a few months ago. This year the Converge record really soaked up a lot of my time. People ask me this question all the time and I draw a blank. This band Black Breath on Southern Lord, I'm really excited about that. And my friend Todd has a new band called Nails. He used to be in Terror and Carry On and Blacklisted, but now he has this band Nails that he's singing and playing guitar in and I'm recording them at the end of the year.

Thank you so much for your time.