The Chicago promoter law that would have made DIY shows very difficult has been shelved. The bill,
discussed last week was designed to rid the city of shady promoters but the strict rules would have had the side effect of making costs prohibitively high for legitimate independent promoters as well.
According to this SunTimes report, a "unprecedented outpouring of concern from the Chicago music community and a meeting with activists and some of the top concert promoters and venue owners in Chicago" led the City Council to not present the bill for a vote. The committee will go back to work on fine-tuning the law. Politics (32 comments)
Please login or register to post comments.What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way. Seriously.
WorryRock (May 14, 2008)
add: going to see flight of the conchords tonight in chicago, should be awesome 3+ Replies
Dante3000 (rich) (May 14, 2008)
According to this SunTimes report, a "unprecedented outpouring of concern from the Chicago music community and a meeting with activists and some of the top concert promoters and venue owners in Chicago. 1+ Reply
MattRamone (May 14, 2008)
"Well gosh, it seems people would be upset if the only live music they could go see were 50 Cent and Rascal Flatts." 2+ Replies
Banal242 (May 14, 2008)
"The bill was tabled to see how much a of kickback the independent promoters can scrap together." Clean your shit up, Chicago. Corrupt city government isn't cute anymore.
telegraphrocks (May 14, 2008)
My girlfriend works for an arts center in Chicago, and they started having this youth-group kind of thing, and blah blah blah it was decided that punk shows would be a good / cool thing to have there, so I was actually gonna start to get involved to book and promote smaller bands there. 4+ Replies
24HourPriapism (May 14, 2008)
they tried something like this a couple years ago in boston...except it was a 10 or 11pm curfew for everyone under 21 in all venues that serve alcohol. so basically, no more 18+ shows or all ages shows at bars, even with the wristband/x-hand rules in effect. it would've killed business, but the bill died before it was put into effect as law. ridiculous shit like that never works. 2+ Replies
MattRamone (May 14, 2008)
Can't believe no one said this yet... 2+ Replies
red_eye_inc (May 14, 2008)
They're cleaning it up so it hits the intended original target: black clubs on the southside. This was a delayed reaction to that stomping/trampling at a nightclub where there was a "party" being promoted, not a musical act performing.
RunninRiot86 (May 14, 2008)
Let's hope the shelf they put the bill on is very tall, very dusty and very out of the way.
sfbarker (May 14, 2008)
This bill is lame. Nothing is more punk rock than sitting with other bands talking about getting completely cheated by some 16-year-old who booked some show and promised a reasonable payout, but then did no promotion and made nothing...only to disappear and go to a different show leaving his girlfriend with a locked cash box. Those are the best of times. 1+ Reply
| Features
Previous
Exclusive StreamsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteNews EditorsKira WisniewskiBrittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Katy Hardy Matthew Baldwin Armando Olivas John Flynn Video EditorChris MoranSocial Media EditorJustin AugustCopy EditorAmelia ClineReviews EditorJoe PeloneInterviews EditorRichard VerducciPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2012 Punknews.org Other Places to GoPunknews.org Flickr Pool |






How punk rock.