- Home
- Submit News
- Bands
- Streams
- Best New Music
- Interviews
- Tours
- Reviews
- New Releases
- Contact Us
- Login
Billy TalentBilly Talent: Billy Talent IIIBilly Talent III (2009)Atlantic / Roadrunner Reviewer Rating: 2 User Rating: Contributed by: MCSalterMCSalter (others by this writer | submit your own) Billy Talent I was a debut album that rocked in parts, and showed promise. Billy Talent II was an amazing album that rocked throughout, and showed passion. Billy Talent III can be summarized in one word: meh. Basically, it's not bad; it's just boring. By the time you reach the first chorus .
Billy Talent I was a debut album that rocked in parts, and showed promise.
Please login or register to post comments.What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
Well at the time of this release, I probably considered II one of my all time favourite albums, it's just that III did absolutely nothing for me. They can do so much better. I'd say their albums have all been really good, 1 being my favourite, and 3 the least. Can't help but feel that this review was a little harsh, I mean the amount of "Punk" crap that gets released every week gets higher ratings than this, and this is a fantastic album. If you actually like Billy Talent, then you'll like this. If you don't then listen to their other albums first before this one and you will. I often mistake I for I when discussing albums that are numbered with roman numerals. I find II or III easier though. I think this album is definitely pretty good. not as good as the two other albums at some points but overall i still think its pretty good but they could do better. Agree with your comments on I, but I thought II was very boring. It really seemed like they took their sound from I and just tried to make it sound more like what was on the radio at the time. I was my favourite, but II had some songs that were better than everything on I. This I don't think I even got through all the way. I think their first album was better than 2. 2 had some sweet tunes however. 3 was ok |
Previous
Exclusive StreamsSponsored EventsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteContributing EditorsBryne Yancey Kira Wisniewski Brittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Armando Olivas John Flynn Chris Moran John GentileCopy EditorAmelia ClinePodcast ProducerNariman ShariatPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2013 Punknews.orgTerms of Use Privacy Policy Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us About Punknews.org Other Places to Go |









They can do so much better.
I think what you mean is they *have* done so much better. No band decides to put out a shitty album. It's a mistake that a lot of people make to think a band is just not trying. They just didn't have a good album in them at the time, which isn't surprising considering they'd been going full pelt for a few years there.