- Home
- Submit News
- Bands
- Streams
- Best New Music
- Interviews
- Tours
- Reviews
- New Releases
- Contact Us
- Login
MastodonMastodon: The HunterThe Hunter (2011)Reprise Reviewer Rating: 4 User Rating: Contributed by: thepopeofchili-townthepopeofchili-town (others by this writer | submit your own) Mastodon were on a steady path for four albums running. Concept albums, somehow related to a particular classical element, a consistently mellowing sound from album to album, and some sweet Paul Romano cover art. You knew what you were getting into when you bought a Mastodon album. They were dependa.
Mastodon were on a steady path for four albums running. Concept albums, somehow related to a particular classical element, a consistently mellowing sound from album to album, and some sweet Paul Romano cover art. You knew what you were getting into when you bought a Mastodon album. They were dependable. For their latest offering, The Hunter, they have decided to eschew all of those reliable albums' elements for something entirely new, but no less awesome.
Please login or register to post comments.What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
Just getting around to listening to this all the way through ... and Holy WOW. It drags a little in spots (it does push an hour after all) ... but this is going to melt my brain for a while to come. Fantastic. Agree with Mohammed. CTS took a while to get used to. Definitely helped it by releasing a great live version of the album on DVD for me. and 'Hunter' is in that 8.5/10 range. Solid record. These guys aren't going anywhere. I swear Josh Homme has uncredited vocals on Curl of the Burl - those "woah-ohhhs" just seal the qotsa deal. I'll leave my unjustified score for when I listen to the whole album.j So the comments section under reviews is where all the drama takes place now on punknews. TNT should sponsor this part of the site. That's why I said "I like to treat it" as such. I didn't claim congruence. You all are hopeless. Enjoy your pointless ratings, and then enjoy bitching how the ratings affect year-end rankings. "So.... don't take reviews seriously? The score is part of the review. If it's a four star review, people expect a bit of criticism. Also, I like to treat five star scores like A's rather than "a perfect piece of art." An A can be anything from 90-100, and therefore there's room for imperfections." @paulsilence Also, I've finally warmed up to "Crack The Skye". I'd also give that a solid 8/10. This, I'd give more of a 8.5/10. May check this out, I love Leviathan, but i've never heard Crack the Skye. Saw 'em live at the time and the song really put me off. I like the sound of this though. So.... don't take reviews seriously? The score is part of the review. If it's a four star review, people expect a bit of criticism. Also, I like to treat five star scores like A's rather than "a perfect piece of art." An A can be anything from 90-100, and therefore there's room for imperfections. Also, good album. "Not saying it needs to be five stars, I'd just like for critics to put more effort into justifying their scores." Pretty enjoyable. Metal album of the year. There are very few metal bands that I can get into, but Mastodon service every single one of my metal needs and desires. I listened to the album front to back four times in a row with no issues. I find every Mastodon release to serve a certain purpose, The Hunter ties all those separate purposes together while still leaving a need for everything that preceded it. I hope this album brings the band fame and fortune and the further credit they have always deserved. Yeah, but there's not a single critical statement justifying lopping off a whole star. Not saying it needs to be five stars, I'd just like for critics to put more effort into justifying their scores. And the whole unattainable five stars thing feels too Pitchforkish to me. Four stars should mean: These tracks are weak in ____ ways, or the production suffers from ___, etc. Something. Five stars for me is "Perfect, all time classic". I've never written a five star review before. This album rules, definitely in my top 10 of the year, but I don't think I could justify five stars. So four stars, eh? Where are the criticisms justifying the score? By reading the review, I found myself confused about this. It reads like a five star review. |
Previous
Exclusive StreamsSponsored EventsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteContributing EditorsBryne Yancey Kira Wisniewski Brittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Armando Olivas John Flynn Chris Moran John GentileCopy EditorAmelia ClinePodcast ProducerNariman ShariatPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2013 Punknews.orgTerms of Use Privacy Policy Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us About Punknews.org Other Places to Go |









this is the first mastodon album i've been disappointed with. there's some good material on it, but it flows weird. even the band has stated that its more like a mix tape, which i would agree as it seems to be unable to decided if it wants to sounds like old mastodon or newer, QOTSA-sounding mastodon. honestly, I have no problem with the melodic direction they've taken but this was a weird record and i don't care for it as a whole.