- Home
- Submit News
- Bands
- Streams
- Best New Music
- Interviews
- Tours
- Reviews
- New Releases
- Contact Us
- Login
At The Drive-InAt The Drive-In: This Station Is Non-OperationalThis Station Is Non-Operational (2005)Fearless Records Reviewer Rating: 4 User Rating: Contributed by: KirbyPuckettKirbyPuckett (others by this writer | submit your own) One of the most prevalent, opinionated arguments when it comes to music is the prejudiced teeter-totter whether if a band should fade away into the dusty bins at used record stores or go out on top leaving their fans craving more. Some listeners have no quandary in continually listening to rehashed .
One of the most prevalent, opinionated arguments when it comes to music is the prejudiced teeter-totter whether if a band should fade away into the dusty bins at used record stores or go out on top leaving their fans craving more. Some listeners have no quandary in continually listening to rehashed material from better days in the careers of musicians. For example, pop-rockers Weezer devoured a five-year absence with their comeback "Green Album," although its sales were every bit as upbeat as the catchy singles, most agree the record and its predecessors do not hold up to legendary releases the "Blue Album" and Pinkerton. On the other side of the park, audiophiles bathe in the ideology that accompany timely exists, cementing the impact from the music forever into whatever history it may hold. Refused, Jawbreaker, and Kid Dynamite are a few modern acts that fit the end description, and while many yearn for reunion tours, fans can confidently assure themselves those renowned images will not be tarnished. In favor of El Paso, Texas' post-punk quintet At The Drive-In, it is particularly the latter, abruptly fracturing their vocation on the heals of their zenith release, with mainstream success overly imminent. By now, every ear as heard the story of how Sparta and the Mars Volta have formed polar opposites of each other's resonance and implement their paramount to carry on the ATDI crown.
Please login or register to post comments.What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
Buy this only if you're a completist and don't have a turntable to get the assorted B-sides from the various EPs--this one's missing a lot of great songs to be called a real Anthology. Stupid way for fearless to to make an extra buck....with all the talent? on that label now they should be set for life. HA. At the drive-in...ehhh go buy "vaya" "acrobatic tenement" and "in casino out" fuck the rest of it. "Seriously, this review is written by the biggest bull-shitter I've ever heard. That first paragraph is total fluff... you're reviewing a goddamn compilation cd, not providing a weezer history lesson. And for god's sake, quit throwing around shit like "prog-rock tendencies"... do you even know what the hell that means, or are you just regurgitating the same press shit we've had to read about the Mars Volta for the past year? The reviewer obviously cares less about writing about this anthology than he does with making himself sound educated." man, you motherfuckers need hobbies. enough with the synonyms and adjectives....this review stinks and i dont like it. This review is garbage. For instance: Wow, methinks that Kirby has an unjustifiably high opinion of his writing skills. Just because you use "big" words doesn't mean that your English skills aren't shit. The first sentence almost gave me a stroke. How awful. You should have your own show on CNN, as you are obviously good at trudging through sentence after sentence while, at the same time, actually saying nothing. "(of course you have a complaint, this is Punknews.org)" "It was a reply to the rant that alluded to this being a cash-in effort by the label. Fool. "If you look up the word "overrated" in the dictionary, it would have a picture of Refused." "Seriously, this review is written by the biggest bull-shitter I've ever heard. That first paragraph is total fluff... you're reviewing a goddamn compilation cd, not providing a weezer history lesson. And for god's sake, quit throwing around shit like "prog-rock tendencies"... do you even know what the hell that means, or are you just regurgitating the same press shit we've had to read about the Mars Volta for the past year? The reviewer obviously cares less about writing about this anthology than he does with making himself sound educated. It was a reply to the rant that alluded to this being a cash-in effort by the label. Fool. "To all of you who are bitching about songs being excluded: I'm not really blaming anyone for the DVD being weak, I just wished there was more to it. I remember downloading some footage of them playing in Australia, it was amazing and really well filmed. I never got to see them play live because I got into them after they went on "hiatus", so I just want a decent DVD of their live stuff. Frodus ruled. Way ahead of their time. This review is far too wordy, so wordy that I stopped about halfway through. To all of you who are bitching about songs being excluded: At the Drive-In kick so much ass. So this should be a treat, I just have a question...Did they add "Heliothrope" and "Napolean Solo" in this? "Napolean Solo" is one of their greatest songs and, at least to me, "Heliothrope" is damn catchy! The DVD isn't even worth mentioning, it's three videos and a lame press kit. Also, I think I am the only person who liked the Smiths cover... Just a killer fucking band. Shame they went under, I really liked the way they were progressing. I still consider RoC one of the best CDs I own. I don't mind Frodus Seriously, this review is written by the biggest bull-shitter I've ever heard. That first paragraph is total fluff... you're reviewing a goddamn compilation cd, not providing a weezer history lesson. And for god's sake, quit throwing around shit like "prog-rock tendencies"... do you even know what the hell that means, or are you just regurgitating the same press shit we've had to read about the Mars Volta for the past year? The reviewer obviously cares less about writing about this anthology than he does with making himself sound educated. "If you look up the word "overrated" in the dictionary, it would have a picture of Refused." "Where's the fucking Refused DVD? They were a thousand times better than ATDI." Oh and BSD, it is true. no one gives a fuck about Frodus. Thanks for agreeing with me. floppy cap? what are you trying to say there? Who plays guitar like Shelby Cinca? That's right, nobody. mxpx review????? I wrote this at work, I new the songs, but I have yet to watch the DVD so I skipped that part. if an band has split and they aint getting back together, then anytime is a good time to release an anthology, numbnuts. this cd just seems too soon for a band like ATDI to be releasing an anthology. it makes me upset that somebody somewhere is going to make some kind of money off this when this is completely necessary. its too soon to starting packing such terrific songs by a monumental band in such a way that fearless is doing. i will never understand why anyone would support this album Needed Invalid Litter Dept. on the CD and DVD that lasted longer than 10 minutes. What is this cd supposed to be? As a greatest hits album, it fails miserably by leaving out almost all of the band's best songs. As a collection of rare songs, remixes, and b-sides, it's pointles since most of the tracks here are readily available. They put together a group of songs to try to summarize the band's career and failed miserably by leaving out their most pivotal work. If you bought this, you got fucked. "Relationship In Command" Where's the fucking Refused DVD? They were a thousand times better than ATDI. frodus is tops. Throw Frodus onto the list of bands going out on top. this cd just seems too soon for a band like ATDI to be releasing an anthology. it makes me upset that somebody somewhere is going to make some kind of money off this when this is completely necessary. its too soon to starting packing such terrific songs by a monumental band in such a way that fearless is doing. i will never understand why anyone would support this album it is just not in my good nature to support something like this "anthology" "many urn for reunion tours"? Kirby with two reviews? To what do we owe this pleasure? score is for DVD. big disappointment. Good review, though you did forget to mention the DVD portion (which I haven't watched yet, but disappointingly contains no live footage). The disclusion of Alfrero Vivo, Carejo! is understandable, but Acrobatic Tenement's is questionable. I could've gone for one or two more rare tracks, too. |
Previous
Exclusive StreamsSponsored EventsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteContributing EditorsBryne Yancey Kira Wisniewski Brittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Armando Olivas John Flynn Chris Moran John GentileCopy EditorAmelia ClinePodcast ProducerNariman ShariatPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2013 Punknews.orgTerms of Use Privacy Policy Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us About Punknews.org Other Places to Go |









"I tend to agree with that. Whats with all the bigger reviews here taking essay form? Lets see...the introductory paragraph thats a little on the fluff side to hook people in: check, the overly wordy body paragraphs: check, a nice little conclusion paragraph: check. Its a freaking CD review, not a fucking essay! It doesn't have to be multiple paragraphs and hundreds of words. I read reviews in magazines and papers and stuff all the time, and they're maybe 100-200 words max, and I get a better idea of the album than I do from these fucking CD review essays. "
Admittedly, this review was iffy, but what the hell is wrong with trying to be actual writers? 'a nice little conclusion paragraph', 'the introductory paragraph thats a little on the fluff side to hook people in'.. what's wrong with good structure?
And also, to the dudes who were calling Refused overrated, you're all wrong.