Punknews.org | At All Costs

Review Navigator

Features

Reviews

At All Costs

Direction
2006
Our Pride

At All Costs - Direction (Cover Artwork)

Review by: Anchors
See others by this writer

At All Costs @ MySpace (link)

Only registered users
can post comments

Published on July 10th 2007

Don't like Set Your Goals?

Me neither.

Don't like ska?

Me neither.

Then you can imagine my disappointment upon the realization that At All Costs' Direction is literally nothing more than an amalgamut of pop-punk, hardcore, and ska. The former two genres are two of my favorite, and even the latter is decent when played correctly, but the mix of all three is probably the worst idea anybody has had since O.J. Simpson's now-canned "If I Did It."

I can't knock their enthusiasm -- and there's certainly plenty of it, but the mix of styles the band is throwing together are styles that were not made to be thrust into that sort of position. "Count on Me" is a perfect example of a band that can't stick to one idea. In no more than 15 seconds' time, they alternate between some pop-punk melodies, hardcore gang vocals, and ska horns without any real semblence of continuity. Even alternating between a ska song, a hardcore song, and a pop-punk song would allow them to establish a rhythm, some sort of ebb and flow that would keep the record from becoming a bogged-down mess.

Simplicity. Simplicity would have been the road to travel here. It's not even that there's a lot happening in the music to keep track of, but the fact that the styles don't meld. The furious gang vocals performed on "Push Ahead" are starkly contrasted by the ska horns, horns which call to mind an upbeat, positive feeling. It's not feasible to have such polar opposites in the same song at the exact same time and still have people believe that the supposed emotion and feeling is genuine. You cannot mix the rage of hardcore with the generally sunny disposition of ska and pop-punk and expect people to take you seriously. I'm sorry, it's not going to happen.

And hopefully, it never will.

Login to rate this album

People who liked this also liked:

Please login or register to post comments.

What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?

Share your opinion by posting comments on the stories that interest you
Rate music and bands and help shape the weekly top ten
Let Punknews.org use your ratings to help you find bands and albums you might like
Customize features on the site to get the news the way you want.

Posted by zombie-guru on 2008-03-14 20:16:39
My Score:

How can you listen to this and call it pop punk or ska influenced? Score is for the review.

Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 13, 2007 at 8:30 AM (EDT)
My Score:

Ska!? I wouldn't say it's ska at all. I would say that it's just oldschool hardcore with horns. I don't even hear the pop-punk reference anywhere in this album, and I would admit it were it there.

It's an awesome album despite this review. It's too bad they're done.

Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 12, 2007 at 4:09 PM (EDT)

This review sucks. This is actually an awesome record. and for all the internet shit talkers...at their last show there was 500 fucking kids. so kick rocks.

Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 12, 2007 at 1:23 AM (EDT)
My Score:

Fuck ska. Score is for ska.

Posted by moneenerd on 2007-07-11 20:28:25

What in the hell is "diversity"?

Posted by defianceohioequalslove on 2007-07-11 20:07:27
My Score:

This is a fucking terrible review. You don't like ska, and you don't like SYG, so you wrote it off. Amazing.

"Currently rocking;

Bright Eyes - Cassadaga
R. Kelly - Double Up
The Chemical Brothers - We are the Night
Hammer Bros. - The Vitality
Rocky Votolato - Burning My Travels Clean"

Straight from Anchors user page. Sorry, but I can't take him seriously at all.

Annnndddddddddddd

""You cannot mix the rage of hardcore with the generally sunny disposition of ska"

Suicide Machines?

Against All Authority?"

Hit the nail on the head perfectly.

Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 5:32 PM (EDT)
My Score:

God forbid you try to do more than one thing with your band. ITS AGAINST ZE R00LS!

Seriously, its impossible to take reviews on this site seriously, theyre all either fanboy gushing or vindictive diatribes based on personal biases.

Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 5:30 PM (EDT)

"Why would anyone want to know anything about such a tired and shitty genre of music?"

Haha, "punk rock".

Posted by wentz_equals_death on 2007-07-11 11:33:19
My Score:

and THIS one is for the entirety of their battle hymns record

Posted by wentz_equals_death on 2007-07-11 11:32:50
My Score:

this score has been chosen for "capsule" by the suicide machines

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 10:12 PM (EDT)

Why would anyone want to know anything about such a tired and shitty genre of music?

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 8:44 PM (EDT)

Haha Anchors doesn't know anything about ska.

Posted by Anchors on 2007-07-10 18:59:54

The third-wave ska, like the kind implemented by this band, has very little, if anything, to do with bands like The Skatalites, who were more akin to reggae than jazz anyhow.

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 6:40 PM (EDT)

"comparing ska to Miles Davis has got to be the stupidest thing I have read in a while"

Comparing this band, or any of those horrible "ska-punk" bands to actual ska (which is actually pretty jazzy sometimes) is worse.

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 2:19 PM (EDT)

this band broke up anyway. the news was posted on here yesterday.

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 1:51 PM (EDT)

correction: Ctska.com got hold of your review

Posted by Anchors on 2007-07-10 13:36:05

Looks like the At All Costs street team got wind of my review!

And comparing ska to Miles Davis has got to be the stupidest thing I have read in a while.

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 12:44 PM (EDT)

Wait..............waaaaaait..................................... ....

....
...
....
...
Yes. Ska still sucks. Yes. Definitely.

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 12:37 PM (EDT)

i hate ska so much. probably because of its "sunny disposition."

signed,

someone who likes to have others read his opinion.

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 10:35 AM (EDT)

"You cannot mix the rage of hardcore with the generally sunny disposition of ska"

Suicide Machines?

Against All Authority?

Posted by alexdank on 2007-07-10 10:33:43

how is this band ANYTHING like a pop-punk band? at all?

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 7:44 AM (EDT)

This is the worst review that I've ever read. Please head down to the local community college and take some writing classes or maybe some journalism classes.

As far as the content of the review, it is pretty sparse. More of an attack on the band. Also what are "Ska Horns"? You do know that Ska music is defined by the upbeat guitar riffs right? Not the fact that the music has horns. Does the Dave Matthews Band play Ska because they have horns? Is classical music Ska because it has horns? No, and At All Costs doesn't play ska.

Garty

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 7:37 AM (EDT)

Well in defence of the reviewer a ska horn section section do play a certain tone and style just like jazz horn players have a certain tone and style so I think your lambasting him about calling them ska horns and then comparing it to jazz is unfounded and if you are comparing this music to jazz by any means this good sir. it is not.

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 4:14 AM (EDT)

Hahaha, ska horns!

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 4:07 AM (EDT)

Holy god damn that is the worst review I've ever read. It's good to know you'd probably write-off a Miles Davis album or something because all the "sunny pop ska horns" don't really fit the whole "cool jazz" style or somehting.

Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 12:17 AM (EDT)

I guess this is the same band that broke up.