FeaturesContestsReviews
| MadballInfiltrate the System2007 Ferret
Review by: GlassPipeMurder See others by this writer Official website (link) Only registered users can post comments Published on September 7th 2007
Few `80s hardcore bands are still managing to get by in 2007. Fewer are as relevant today as they were when "hardcore" actually meant something. And even fewer are putting out their best work 20 years after they began. But just like the norm of late `80s hardcore bands that were done by the early `90s, there are exceptions. And few, if any, have been as potent a force as Madball.
Please login or register to post comments. What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
Finally somebody on this dumbass website has the mental capacity to understand the intricacies of MAD FUCKING BALL. good retort glasspipe. nothing personal. i'm an english student, critiquing writing is what i do. i wasnt saying that madball is not influential, just that your evidence wasnt very good. anyway i probably should have just kept my mouth shut... glasspipe's the only one making any sense here. i haven't heard a single argument about why madball are bad either musically or as people. i've just heard the word "bro" about a thousand times. that's not an argument. glasspipe gave some pretty good reasons why they're good as both a band (evolving music, better lyrics) and as people (giving to charity). i haven't heard the album or hung out with the band really, so i can't say for sure, but glasspipe is at least persuasive. Punkgato, I don't expect anyone who defends Brodown will 1) put together a logical argument, 2) care too much for music OR lyrics. "there are more important things in life than music and lyrics" ...in regards to music with lyrics? the commentary about throwdown does nothing to aid the review. it only clutters it. being told that madball does not sound like throwdown seems somewhat arbitrary. madball doesnt sound like lots of bands. also i dont see how giving a portion of the proceeds to charity makes their lyrics good. again the two have nothing to do with each other. and finally being somebody's friend on myspace and being mentioned in a punknews comment hardly qualifies as having lasting influence. Some of you guys should give these dudes a break. I did an interview with them and they were pretty cool: the commentary about throwdown does nothing to aid the review. it only clutters it. being told that madball does not sound like throwdown seems somewhat arbitrary. madball doesnt sound like lots of bands. also i dont see how giving a portion of the proceeds to charity makes their lyrics good. again the two have nothing to do with each other. and finally being somebody's friend on myspace and being mentioned in a punknews comment hardly qualifies as having lasting influence. this band fucking blows... i dont care if i cant post anonymous. well considering you're probably some 17 year old internet punk who thinks he's awesome cause he can make fun of bands that are easy targets, i think that's pretty funny. Paul from None More Black got super pissed at me when I called Madball lame and gave me a lecture about how true friends stick together. true story. madball was on thorp before ferret to be technical, i don't think they ever broke up. they took a two year hiatus in like 2001, and that was due to issues within the band. i'm no expert on the band, but it seems like you're missing the point. check out "I Can't Wait" by Good Clean Fun for a similar perspective. I used wikipedia just like you seemed to have...2003 was a Roadrunner cash-in, not an album! Uhh...they borke up after Roadrunner dumped them, and got back together 4 years later when "hardcore" picked back up and signed to Ferret. They're just as bad as Jack Kelly and Ray Cappo! they really need to hang it up. seriously it hasnt been good in...well it was never good. Uhh...didn't Madball do exactly that??? "Novelty" takes aim at the resurgence of hardcore bands that broke up when hardcore stopped being fashionable and reunited when there was more money to be made." yes madball is an easy target,but give me those lyrics as quoted in the review over any lyrics posted on this site in the last 6 months This record is excellent for flexing, posing, trying on wife-beaters, rolling blunts, shadow-boxing, and recycling riffs for the 6th time! i consider myself macho and tough. not madball's idea of tough but more along the lines of randy "macho man" savage. Oh man, i had totally forgotten about the pie chart. This is the tough guy hardcore equivalent of what Hawthorne Heights is to the nu-emo scene. Adam: NMB gave Madball some plugs when this album came out via myspace bulletins. And to answer your question, most bands choose their "top 8" deliberately, and it makes sense as Paul Delaney has played with Madball. people who say theyre tough guy dont listen to madball. lots of their lyrics are pretty damn positive. this album is great, better than legacy but a tad worse than hold it down while madball may've been come about in the 80s, when i think "80s hardcore" theyre certainly not one of the first(or last, for that matter)bands to come to mind These guys are tuff. nice, hardworking guys. not my personal favourite hardcore band, but lots of respect for them. great review though--gotta check out the album I will say this first before anyone else does. pretty gay Hey, the perfect band for "words can not express how much fuck this band" Does MySpace really hold such social sway that the ranking of a band on another band's friends list has any meaning? That just seems like a strange point to make. this review is way too long For those interested: Well, since the shit-talking comment-fighting is almost inevitable, I'll kick it off: Madball sucks, tough guy hardcore is bullshit, and that review with the pie chart was one of the best things PN has ever seen. Can't take this bad seriously. |