As many of you know, Epitaph has been a notable supporter of eMusic for many years, back to when eMusic was just beginning. Unfortunately for all of us, they have decided that we can only continue to sell their music to you if we agree to charge you iTunes prices - 99 cents a song. Obviously this isn't something we're comfortable doing.eMusic touts itself as the world's largest retailer of independent music and is the second-largest digital music service after iTunes. They've sold more than 150 million downloads, but their DRM free model and low pricing (which can dip as low as 27 cents per song depending on the monthly subscription model chosen) has made it unpalatable to the major labels and several large independents. In April of this year Victory Records also pulled their catalogue.
At a time when the music industry is in such steep decline, our research and experience shows us that consumers are still willing to buy music, provided the value is right. And 99 cents a song is not an acceptable price point for all consumers. That's one reason why eMusic exists and has been so successful; those consumers who are willing to spend more on music (provided the price is right) do so with us. You spend more than 14 times as much as the average iTunes customer at a time when per capita spending on all music and audio is under $24. You buy twenty times more music than the average iTunes customer.
Posted by adam on Monday, September 17, 2007 at 12:00 PM (EDT)
Digital music pioneers eMusic have been dealt another blow, as Epitaph Records along with their associated labels like Anti- and Hellcat, have pulled their catalogues from the service. The blog 17 dots, which is run by eMusic employees but not an official endeavor of the company, posted an commentary and offered some background on the decision:
Epitaph Records (33 comments)
Please login or register to post comments.What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way. Seriously.
TheOneTrueBill (September 17, 2007)
Well this is really shitty. I subscribed to EMusic for awhile a few years ago and one of the best parts was that it gave a way to get all of those old, out of print Epitaph albums, stuff from DBL and the Joykiller. 1+ Reply
AndyPonch (September 17, 2007)
Epitaph also left Sound of California for ADA (an "indie" distro arm of a major) as of this month or October. SOC supported Epitaph when they were nothing and now they just gave a big "fuck you" to them as well. While SOC wasn't an exclusive distributor for Epitaph by any means, not selling direct to them and forcing them to get the stuff from ADA is really stupid. This goes hand in hand with the eMusic deal I'm sure. Basically, there's more to this story than just .99 cent downloads. 3+ Replies
BobLoblaw (September 17, 2007)
This one thing may be small when you look at the big picture, but it's shit like this that makes it hard to believe that this is the same label I loved so much at one point.
BrandonSideleau (September 17, 2007)
eh.....changes nothing for me.....I download all music illegally before I buy it to make sure it sounds good....if I like it then I'll drive to my nearest record store and buy it.....Id rather have the actual album than a bunch of Emusic mp3s. I can, however, understand how much this may suck for people who don't live near record stores (although, at this point, I don't think it would be difficult to find Epitaph albums at all major albums everywhere in the world.) 3+ Replies
facetofacereunion08 (September 17, 2007)
brett is so money hungry. what a prick he is. 1+ Reply
skaboom (September 17, 2007)
I don't know, I can see why he's doing it. I had eMusic back when it was a flat monthly fee. $45 for a three month subscription. I downloaded maybe 200 albums over that time. That's under a quarter each.
Nameless (September 17, 2007)
In all honesty, I can't say this affects me too much. But, it's still sad nonetheless.
Jimmy_the_Saint (September 17, 2007)
Punknews Records is also distributed by Epitaph and was previously available via eMusic. What's their take? | Features
Previous
Exclusive StreamsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteNews EditorsKira WisniewskiBrittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Katy Hardy Matthew Baldwin Armando Olivas John Flynn Video EditorChris MoranSocial Media EditorJustin AugustCopy EditorAmelia ClineReviews EditorJoe PeloneInterviews EditorRichard VerducciPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2012 Punknews.org Other Places to GoPunknews.org Flickr Pool |






Boo!
It's a damn shame that Epitaph and eMusic couldn't sort this out. A compromise would be to keep the back catalogue on the service but only serve new releases via iTunes or wherever they can charge the higher price, then move them over at a later date.
I have no problem paying for music, but the beauty of eMusic's model is that it allows me to legally pick up things that I'm only casually interested in with very little financial consequences. I can explore stuff that I'm not dying to get without going broke, and I end up as a whole purchasing much more music. The outcome of this change is not going to be "Oh well I guess I'll go pay 10 bucks for that old Gas Huffer record over at iTunes," it's going to be "Oh well, I wasn't really interested in that anyways, I'll get something else here at eMusic."
-adam