Posted by aubin on Monday, April 13, 2009 at 1:30 PM (EDT)
Apple's recently introduced tiered pricing has had an immediate impact on sales through the iTunes music store. Until recently, all music through iTunes was solid for 99¢ but the major labels pressured Apple to allow price increases to $1.29 and also promised decreases of "some" catalogue songs to 69¢.
Billboard examined the results and found that $1.29 songs lost an average of 5.3 places on the chart while the $0.99 songs gained an average of 2.5 chart positions. For a price increase (to $1.29 from $0.99) to result in an equal or greater amount of revenue, unit sales would to drop by no less than 23.3%. Even more noticeable is the rarity of 69¢ songs promised by the labels. Gizmodo found one, a Limp Bizkit/Bubba Sparx collaboration, remixed by Timbaland. Games and Technology (82 comments)
Please login or register to post comments.What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way. Seriously.
Dante3000 (rich) (April 13, 2009)
What a surprise, Apple tries something based on pressure from major labels and it fails. Who would have thought?
Oldpunkerforever (April 13, 2009)
boo to itunes, nothing will ever compare to walking into a good old fashioned record store, that feeling you get is second to none-oldpunker- 3+ Replies
MilesQToast (April 13, 2009)
I've bought a shitload of songs in the last 3 weeks and none of them have been more than 99 cents. Guess I'm just indie as fuck. 1+ Reply
belfast-sxe-vegan-madman (April 13, 2009)
I actually turned a few dudes from itunes vegan the other week through one of my vegan workshops was awesome 6+ Replies
RossHostage (April 13, 2009)
I think the statistic regarding the drop in unit sales is bogus because the new price point is really competing with the people who download music for free. If you're really so cheap that a 30 cent increase keeps you from buying music you're an asshole to begin with. 4+ Replies
Vulture_Dude (April 13, 2009)
who needs iTunes, emusic has more great tunes than I'll ever have the chance to listen to. They just need to bring back Epitaph and the other half of the Fat Wreck catalogue that recently went missing
Guy_Incognito (April 13, 2009)
As hinted in the story, I'm sure this calculation is currently being done and watched closely over the next few months. If $1.29 turns out to be a less than optimal price point, it will go away.
Big_Guy (April 13, 2009)
why would someone pay to download music? 2+ Replies
fox82 (April 13, 2009)
I can only imagine a load of coke-head execs sitting around a table staring at each other's ponytail yelling at each other and going 'huh? 69 cents? are fucking shitting me?' Of course they are going to sell everything for 1.29, since it equates maximum profit or something.
fallingupwards84 (April 13, 2009)
i was under the impression that only the hit singles would be $1.29 and the rest a lower price
fallingupwards84 (April 13, 2009)
this is the beauty of the free-market system though... iTunes thought they could increase prices but consumers responded by buying less music and lowering demand 2+ Replies
BarleyPat (April 13, 2009)
How's everyones local/independent music shop doing these days?
SumWon (April 13, 2009)
I 've been wanting that Limp Bizkit/Bubba Sparx track remixed by Timbaland for ages, I've just been patiently waiting for the price to go down. Now is my time to strike!
jlee562 (April 13, 2009)
"Greed, it ain't goin' anywhere! They should have that across a big billboard on Times Square." ~ Joe Strummer.
drugmoney (April 13, 2009)
seems like bullshit to me, i mean who really pays to download an album? does the art work come with the download? im sure the only "artist's" effected by this are the ones who have only one song on their entire album that anybody likes, you know the one played 3 X's an hour.
LeightonESmith (April 14, 2009)
For every $1.29 song there should be a 69cent song. 1+ Reply
| Features
Previous
Contests
Exclusive StreamsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteNews EditorsKira WisniewskiBrittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Katy Hardy Matthew Baldwin Armando Olivas John Flynn Video EditorChris MoranSocial Media EditorJustin AugustCopy EditorAmelia ClineReviews EditorJoe PeloneInterviews EditorRichard VerducciPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2012 Punknews.org Other Places to GoPunknews.org Flickr Pool |






still laughing over that last line.