Punknews.org
The Wednesdays - Invisible Youth (Cover Artwork)

The Wednesdays

The Wednesdays: Invisible YouthInvisible Youth (2005)
Thorp Records

Reviewer Rating: 2


Contributed by: AnchorsAnchors
(others by this writer | submit your own)

The last few months have seen a slew of bands sign to Thorp Records; the likes of Holland's Discipline, Drowningman, and the U.S. Bombs have been added to their ever-growing roster, in addition to solid releases from such bands as Angel City Outcasts and Brain Failure. It's more than safe to say tha.
iTunes StoreAmazon


The last few months have seen a slew of bands sign to Thorp Records; the likes of Holland's Discipline, Drowningman, and the U.S. Bombs have been added to their ever-growing roster, in addition to solid releases from such bands as Angel City Outcasts and Brain Failure. It's more than safe to say that Thorp has been on a roll, but unfortunately for the label, the Wednesdays' Invisible Youth aren't doing their part to keep that forward momentum going.

What starts out strong in the way of opener "You Cannot Fail" quickly starts to fizzle out, struggling not to fade into the background entirely. And to be perfectly honest, I don't know what it is that prevents this record from being as successful as it could be. The Wednesdays seem to have a competent core of musicians, but a lot of the songs never pick up enough momentum to truly be anything worthwhile. With influences cited as the Riverboat Gamblers, the Stooges, and the Clash, it seems to hint at an interesting mix of punk and Southern rock, but what happens instead is confusion. The catchy tunes are overtaken when the band is incapable of finding a comfortable niche, a niche they can truly hit their stride in. It's on and off for the band.

"They Will Hunt Us Down" serves as a great example of the loss of direction that the band seems to be facing. The infectious punk rock spirit that set the record off has given way to a rather down-trodden, muddled attempt at revitalizing Southern rock. It absolutely does not work for the band, and while I do commend their attempt to branch their talents into other styles, they need to focus on picking styles that play well of their talents, because their current choices aren't faring well. If the band would stick to their punk leanings, as found in "One Two Three Four Dracula," what we would have is a much more cohesive and much more focused record that never loses sight of what it's trying to do.

Rounding the album out, the band uses one of their stronger tracks, one that keeps a tremendous rhythm and energy throughout, despite the use of organ that feels out of place. "It's Just Unusual" is short, sweet, and effective, just as everything else could have been. It's frustrating when a band's ambition puts too much on their plate to effectively handle. That's the case with the Wednesdays, and although they seem to be a talented outfit, this album is not the realization of it.

 


Please login or register to post comments.What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
  • Share your opinion by posting comments on the stories that interest you
  • Rate music and bands and help shape the weekly top ten
  • Let Punknews.org use your ratings to help you find bands and albums you might like
  • Customize features on the site to get the news the way you want.
Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not respon sible for them in any way. Seriously.
Anonymous (September 14, 2005)

"bands that have names that include a day of the week suck"
or something like that... heard it somewhere.

Anonymous (September 9, 2005)

Hey Anchors, I usually leave a slew of criticisms and death threats in the comments section of your reviews, but I thought you did a good job on this one. Kudos.

Anonymous (September 9, 2005)

This is a really good review, nice job Anchors.

You really do a good job.

Anonymous (September 9, 2005)

except for Tooth and Nail.

Anonymous (September 9, 2005)

Thorp and Ferret have to be the worst two labels in existence.

stevejonestherealbones (September 9, 2005)

oops...yeah, i saw those posts, or at least one of the ones you left. my mistake whoever i quoted down there. that guy was a whiney bitch

- jones

- bones

adam (September 9, 2005)

Jones, that comment was in response to one I deleted that was posted in every review. It wasn't directed to the reviewer.

-adam

Anonymous (September 9, 2005)

"There's a lot that I like about this record. I admit it hasn't captivated me or anything, but there's a ton of potential here and all the right ingredients are in place. Given time this band could release something amazing.

-adam"

Yeah, this record isn't like record of the year material but Christ is it fun and catchy. I like it!

stevejonestherealbones (September 9, 2005)

"SERIOUSLY.

Fuck off and stop being a whiney bitch."

hahah. oh man, you realise no matter what a staff writer puts in his review, since he is supposed to review it, so no matter how whiney it is....it will never be a bigger "whiney bitch" comment than this one you just made

- jones the bones

- stevejones8770@yahoo.com

adam (September 9, 2005)

There's a lot that I like about this record. I admit it hasn't captivated me or anything, but there's a ton of potential here and all the right ingredients are in place. Given time this band could release something amazing.

-adam

Anonymous (September 9, 2005)

SERIOUSLY.

Fuck off and stop being a whiney bitch.

Exclusive Streams

Newest Reviews

Punknews.org Team

Other Places to Go