FeaturesContestsReviews
| The ScareSnakes Among Saints2006 Lawnchair
Review by: Anchors See others by this writer A Pictoral Synopsis (link) Only registered users can post comments Published on October 27th 2006
I would love it if somebody could explain to me the fixation on blood that so many new bands seem to have.
Please login or register to post comments. What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
if this is the austrailian band then they kick ass i met them n theyr gawjuss the 2 man mosh pit roked :D I dig this album. I mean, I'm more of an Affront kinda guy, but it's still ill. Hmm, I've heard a lot of mixed things about this band. MRR said they were pretty decent sounding along the lines of old AFI with Milo-esque vocals. Though here they are getting torn apart, but can't say that doesn't surprise me. Guess I'll have to check them out on pure volume or myspace or wherever bands post MP3s these days. I've seen this band and I'll tell you what they sound like: You think it's a new fixation that bands have with blood and shit? How old are you? Nah, the scare doesn't rock " that trite nu-emo/hardcore bullshit" with their lyrics. "LOL opinions are like assholes and most of them stink. The great thing about punknews is that you can critique the review. This review doesn't give you any insight of what this band sounds like, just that the reviewer ain't down with death and doesn't appreciate dark imagery and the subtleties behind it. People take shit too literal and don't stop to think about what's really being said. The Scare fucking rule. The shits fast catchy punk rock with a dark edge (duh). And the dudes in the band are solid though I'm sure they'd get a kick out of internet slander calling them full of themselves. Also the split they did with Devotion To Trust is pretty sick if you like the more hardcore side of things." LOL opinions are like assholes and most of them stink. The great thing about punknews is that you can critique the review. This review doesn't give you any insight of what this band sounds like, just that the reviewer ain't down with death and doesn't appreciate dark imagery and the subtleties behind it. People take shit too literal and don't stop to think about what's really being said. The Scare fucking rule. The shits fast catchy punk rock with a dark edge (duh). And the dudes in the band are solid though I'm sure they'd get a kick out of internet slander calling them full of themselves. Also the split they did with Devotion To Trust is pretty sick if you like the more hardcore side of things. i remember when saves the day had meaningless violent lyrics, remember when saves the day was cool? that's how old that gimmick is. that review was written by one of their friends, or at least someone who let them sleep on their floor. Eh. . .much better review here: i thought this was the emo band from Australia. I'm still waiting for someone to review the new albums from Death Before Dying, Bleeding Bloody Blood, Fighting Through With Visions of Blood, and Triumph Through Victory. I saw this band open for Strike Anywhere, it was pretty bad. Score is for two different reviews with the word "devoid" in them. "I would love it if somebody could explain to me the fixation on blood that so many new bands seem to have." I'm sure you already know this, but the reason for all the blood, angels, death and blades is because needlessly violent imagery is what passes for lyrical content now. |