Contributed by an Anonymous Source. Posted by Justin on Monday, November 19, 2007 at 7:00 PM (EST)
In an interview with BBC Radio 6 personality Steve Lamacq Radiohead frontman Thom Yorke let the world know the band's grand scheme with their donation-based sale of their recent opus In Rainbows: there was none. Contrary to what seemed to be the case, the band had no plans of turning the industry on it's head as many analysts and bloggers speculated. It seems it was an idea thought up by their management who were reticent to sign a contract without a finished record. The band kept the plan close to themselves with Yorke keeping even his wife in the dark about it and compares the move to leaking the album themselves, only allowing some profit to be made.
The band decided to release a digital version of In Rainbows, allowing the customer to pay whatever they felt they needed to for it, a move heralded as a sea change in the industry, given the band's stature. However they then received a fair amount of criticism for then going back to a traditional label for widespread physical distribution. For the full interview you can listen here. Our friends at Quote Unquote recently commented on the situation saying: Is this a bummer? Who knows. Games and Technology (64 comments)
Please login or register to post comments.What are the benefits of having a Punknews.org account?
Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way. Seriously.
Dante3000 (rich) (November 19, 2007)
So...You felt it wasn't a complete or finished album and yet you asked fans to pay for it? And then would like them to by the CD version when that comes out? Yeah, this is kinda yucky. 1+ Reply
SonnySix (November 19, 2007)
has anyone seen that new converse add with the gainesville band's music playing? what band is that? i just caught that commercial on espn. 2+ Replies
KingofMPLS (November 19, 2007)
I'm curious to know how well Quote Unquote does with their donation system. Something tells me it's working out slightly better for them. At least I would like to think so. 3+ Replies
blue_drink (November 19, 2007)
How many people made the call that this was probably just going to be a publicity stunt? 1+ Reply
Ollywood (November 19, 2007)
You won't find this on Pitchfork. They wouldn't want to not suck Thom Yorkes Cock. 2+ Replies
skankbook (November 19, 2007)
Every time I see this shit about Radiohead I want to give Jeff Rosenstock more money. 1+ Reply
Deadpan (November 19, 2007)
I don't know whether to be impressed, or find the nearest picture of Thom Yorke I can and take a shit on it before mailing it to him. This is pretty weak.
the_problem_with_fire (November 19, 2007)
hahahaha, radiohead doesn't give a fuck about doing anything to the music industry, just trying to rake in more money from their fans by offering them weak audio files and no lyrics or artwork... how revolutionary.
misterspike (November 19, 2007)
Well, doesn't Trent Reznor feel silly after donating tens of thousands. Er, probably not. 2+ Replies
sugarfull (November 19, 2007)
I'm pretty sure that Impaled are giving an album away for free, and they don't have a management to tell them to do it.
Albert_Belle (November 19, 2007)
Well, they still have O.K. Computer and The Bends to their credit, which makes them better than every band on this site. 10+ Replies
karmabad (November 20, 2007)
yeah i was hoping that they would have just the digital release and go onto the next project or tour...wasnt surprised that they signed to a label, but have some balls! if you're going to do it, do all the way thru!! oh well. the albums still solid
Someone (November 20, 2007)
it was still a good album and i didnt pay anything for it so fuck if i care.
Someone (November 20, 2007)
it was still a good album and i didnt pay anything for it so fuck if i care.
Someone (November 20, 2007)
it was still a good album and i didnt pay anything for it so fuck if i care. 1+ Reply
epoch (November 20, 2007)
I don't see why this is such a big deal, maybe I am missing something. The band never stated that they were doing this to "screw over" the RIAA; that's just something that blogger weenies came up. And since blogger weenies are actually listed to, and then parroted (and I do not know why) the notion found its way into the ether of the mainstream media, and then all of the sudden, the story is "Hey Radiohead are fucking the major labels!"
They weren't. They didn't have a label, so they figured "Hey, let's do this. It will be a fun project, and we can afford to do it." I downloaded the album, listened to it intently for a few days, at which point, I paid for it. I paid a fair price, at that, and I don't regret it. Whether the industry wants to look at my money and go "Lookie! A new target demographic!" is up to them, but I'l show rest of comment | Features
Previous
Exclusive StreamsNewest Reviews
Punknews.org TeamManaging EditorAdam WhiteNews EditorsKira WisniewskiBrittany Strummer Andrew Waterfield Katy Hardy Matthew Baldwin Armando Olivas John Flynn Video EditorChris MoranSocial Media EditorJustin AugustCopy EditorAmelia ClineReviews EditorJoe PeloneInterviews EditorRichard VerducciPublisherAubin PaulISSN 1710-5366© Copyright 1999-2012 Punknews.org Other Places to GoPunknews.org Flickr Pool |






Nobody cares anymore.